[1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL / DETERMINATION OF QUORUM]
[00:00:07]
SEPTEMBER 9TH, PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD. MADAM SECRETARY, PLEASE CALL THE
ROLL. >> MEMBER SCHAFFER. >> HERE.
>> MEMBER BENNETT? >> MARK, UNMUTE. >> HERE.
>> MEMBER STEVENSON. >> HERE. >> MEMBER ROBAS?
>> HERE. >> MEMBER GINGHER. >> HERE.
>> CHAIR MINSHEW? HERE. >> MEMBER BOYLAN IS ABSENT.
>> ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A QUORUM. OUR FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS
[2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE]
THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, IF EVERYBODY WOULD PLEASE STAND.>> THANK YOU. SO WE HAVE NO MINUTES TO APPROVE SO LET'S START INTO OUR OLD
[4. OLD BUSINESS]
BUSINESS. ITEM 4.1 LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THIS IS A DISCUSSION AROUND RACE TRACKS. DEFINITION. I'M GOING TO TURN THIS OVER TOMISS GIBSON. >> YES. THANK YOU.
THIS IS A FOLLOW-UP ITEM FROM OUR AUGUST 4 MEETING. THIS IS ONE OF THE REMAINING LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT. IT WAS A MINOR AMENDMENT, BUT ONE THE COMMISSION DIRECTED.
AT THE PRIOR BOARD MEETING WE DISCUSSED THE DEFINITION OF A RACE TRACK.
WE ALSO WENT THROUGH THE ADDITIONAL PROVISION OF THE TABLE LAND USES AND TABLE ACCESSORY USES WHICH WOULD HAVE A RACE TRACK AS BLANK, MEANING IT IS PROHIBITED IN ALL ZONING DISTRICTS. THE REQUESTED FOLLOW-UP THIS EVENING IS BASED ON YOUR DIRECT REVISION TO INCORPORATE WHERE IT MIGHT ALLOW FOR RACE TRACKS LIKE SPECIAL EVENTS FOR MORE SPECIAL USE. BUT ALSO TO MAKE SURE IT WAS INCUMBENT, THAT IT DIDN'T APPLY JUST TO AUTOMOBILE, ALL PHASES OF RACING. I BELIEVE THAT THE DEFINITION THAT WAS CIRCULATED TO YOU NOT ON THE WEBSITE AT THIS POINT IN TIME, BUT ON THE SCREEN.
IT'S FOR THOSE ATTENDING VIRTUALLY. YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO SEE IT ON THE SCREEN. I'LL GO THROUGH THE CONTACT LIST.
YOU WILL BE ABLE TO SEE IT ON THE SCREEN AS WELL.
THIS EVENING I REQUESTED A LITTLE BIT OF A REVISION BASED ON SOME FEEDBACK THAT I RECEIVED FROM A BOARD MEMBER, WHO POINTED OUT THROUGH THE NATURE OF WHAT WAS PROPOSED AND PROVIDED ON THE AGENDA THIS EVENING, AND SO I'M ASKING FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THIS REVISED AGENDA, GOING WITH
THE DIRECTION PROVIDED PREVIOUSLY. >> CAN YOU JUST READ IT TO US SO
WE ALL KNOW WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT? >> YES.
IT READS RACE TRACK, FACILITY CONSISTING OF A PAVED OR UNPAVED PURPOSE, USED FOR ANY TYPE OF RACING OR DRIVING. A RACE TRACK MAY OR MAY NOT INCLUDE SEATING, CONCESSION AREAS, PARKING FACILITIES. THIS DEFINITION SHALL ALSO INCLUDE ANY FACILITY USED FOR SIMULATED RACING OR DRIVING CONDITIONS. THERE ARE EXAMPLES TEST TRACK, SIMILAR FACILITIES. RACE TRACKS ARE PROHIBITED IN ALL ZONING DISTRICTS EXCEPT AS A PERMITTED SPECIAL EVENT OR THROUGH AN APPROVED FACILITY USE AGREEMENT.
>> OKAY. WHAT QUESTIONS DO PEOPLE HAVE? COMMENTS?
ANYONE ON THE SCREEN? >> I HAVE A QUESTION. >> OKAY.
>> I HAVE A QUESTION. SO IT HAS TO HAVE A START POINT AND END POINT, CORRECT?
>> YES, MA'AM. IT WOULD BE AS DEFINED BY THE PERMIT THAT'S ISSUED FOR THAT
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? HEARING NONE, CHAIR WOULD
ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> I WOULD MAKE A MOTION TO REPLACE THE CURRENT PROPOSED SECTION 1.07.00 THAT WAS PROPOSED IN OUR PACKAGE WITH THE NEWER VERSION PROPOSED BY KELLY
AS SHOWN ON THE SCREEN THIS EVENING. >> IS THERE A SECOND? MISS GINGHER, ARE YOU SECONDING IT? OKAY.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE, RAISE THEIR HAND.
[00:05:02]
>> AYE. >> AYE. >> ALL OPPOSED?
>> NEW BUSINESS. >> I GOT SOME MORE QUESTIONS ON THAT SECTION.
>> WHAT SECTION? >> THE ONE WE'RE ON -- WHERE WE HAD A NEW PARAGRAPH.
THERE'S OTHER AREAS. >> OKAY. >> LET ME GO AHEAD.
IF EVERYBODY IS LOOKING AT THAT FILE, RIGHT UNDER THE PARAGRAPH THAT WE JUST INTRODUCED AND APPROVED UNDER 1.07.00, THERE'S A NEXT PARAGRAPH SAYS ADDING. IT'S RACE TRACK.
OKAY. I WOULD PROPOSE JUST FOR CLARITY PURPOSES, RACE TRACK IS A USE CATEGORY IN QUOTATIONS JUST SO PEOPLE UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT USE MEANS.
I UNDERSTAND IT, BUT IT'S MORE JUST A CLARIFICATION. WE DO HAVE A USE CATEGORY.
I'M OPEN TO, IF YOU DON'T WANT TO DO IT, I'M NOT OPPOSED. I JUST THINK IT MAKES A LITTLE EASIER FOR SOMEBODY WHO'S NOT FAMILIAR WITH THAT SENTENCE IS SAYING.
>> FOR THE SAKE OF THAT DOCUMENT YOU ARE REVIEWING, I DID NOT INCLUDE THE OVERALL TABLE OF ALL THE LAND USES. THE WAY THAT YOU WOULD DO THIS DESCRIBED IN THE CODE ITSELF WOULD BE UNDER THOSE SPECIFIC TABLES 2.03.02 AND 2.03.03. YOU WOULD SEE ALL THE USES GOING ACROSS IN A SEPARATE ROW AND IT WOULD FALL UNDER R FOR RACE TRACK.
THAT'S WHERE IT WOULD BE. SO YOU SEE ALL OF THE USES OUTLINED THAT WAY.
>> IT'S JUST THE FOURTH WORD IS USE. I'M JUST SAYING THAT IS A CATEGORY, AS A USE. I'M SAYING THE USE CATEGORY AS TO THE TABLES.
JUST TO HIGHLIGHT THAT IS A NEW -- IT'S A CATEGORY. USE LISTS A WHOLE BUNCH OF CATEGORIES. IT'S A NEW ONE. RACE IS A USE CATEGORY.
>> SO LET ME ASK KELLY A QUESTION. DO YOU USE THE WORD CATEGORY IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE OR DO YOU JUST SIMPLY REFER TO PRINCIPLE LAND USE AS ACCESSORY
LAND USE STPHRS >> JUST THE WAY IT IS. >> SO YOU NORMALLY DO NOT USE
THE WORD CATEGORY ANYWHERE ON ANY OTHER OF THESE -- >> NO.
IT WOULD JUST READ SINGLE FAMILY HOME. PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
RETAIL. IT DOESN'T SAY RETAIL CATEGORY AND SUBCATEGORIES.
NOTHING LIKE THAT. >> OKAY. MY OTHER ONE IS ON THE TWO
TABLES, AND THAT'S GOING TO BE ON TABLE 2.03.02 AND -- >> RIGHT.
>> ALL RIGHT. THE FIRST TABLE HAS THE ITEM CALLED RACE TRACK.
SECOND TABLE IT CALLS IT AUTOMOBILE RACE TRACK. >> THAT SHOULD READ RACE TRACK.
>> ALL RIGHT. READY TO MOVE ON? SO THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA
[5. NEW BUSINESS]
IS 5.1. 2020-08 VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION SUBDIVISION.KELLY, IS THIS YOU? I AM TURNING THE FLOOR OVER TO YOU.
YES, MISS ROBAS. >> DID WE APPROVE THE MEETING MINUTES OR JUST THE CHANGE IN
THE LANGUAGE? >> WE HAVE NO MEETING MINUTES TO APPROVE.
FOR RIGHT NOW. >> THANK YOU. >> SORRY.
I SKIPPED OVER THAT TOO QUICKLY. I APOLOGIZE. ALL RIGHT.
>> BOARD MEMBERS, TONIGHT WE'RE GOING TO HEAR THREE CASES THAT INVOLVE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION LAND USE AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS. JUST KIND OF A BRIEF OVERVIEW BEFORE WE GET INTO THE FIRST APPLICATION. ALL OF THESE PROPERTY OWNERS SUBMITTED VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION PETITIONS. AND THE CITY IS ACTING ON THESE REQUESTS BECAUSE THEY ARE CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS AND WE'RE ASSIGNING LAND USE AND OWNING THAT MOST CLOSELY RESEMBLES THE EXISTING NASSAU COUNTY LAND USE AND ZONING.
SO THE FIRST CASE TONIGHT 2020-0008 IS FOR A GROUP OF PROPERTIES OFF OF SIMMONS ROAD.
>> CAN I INTERRUPT YOU A FULL SECOND TO GET A FULL SCREEN? >> YES.
[00:10:10]
HERE WE GO. SO THIS VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION ASSIGNMENT OF FUTURE LAND USE MAP CATEGORY FOR ALL 11 PARCELS OF LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITH THE R-1 ZONING DISTRICT.THE PARCELS INCLUDE TEN PARCELS IN THE SUBDIVISION CALLED THE PLANTATION HAMMOCK SUBDIVISION ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SIMMONS ROAD. THAT APPROVAL, OR EXCUSE ME, THAT VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION REQUEST WAS MADE BY THE DEVELOPER IN 2014 BEFORE THE SUBDIVISION WAS SUBDIVIDED AND APPROVED THROUGH NASSAU COUNTY. THE PARCEL ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SIMMONS ROAD, 847 SIMMONS ROAD, REQUESTED VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION FOR WATER SERVICES IN 2018.
THESE PROPERTIES BECAME CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY LIMITS IN 2016 WHEN THE LAKE SIDE SUBDIVISION WAS ANNEXED INTO THE CITY WHICH YOU CAN SEE ON THE MAP HERE, IT'S NOT A LEGEND, WHICH THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN, BUT THE YELLOW BOUNDARY ON THE LEFT SIDE OF AMELIA ROAD IS THE CURRENT CITY BOUNDARIES. AMELIA ROAD AND SIMMONS ROAD, WHILE BETWEEN THE CITY BOUNDARY AND SUBJECT PARCELS DOES NOT PROHIBIT THE EXPANSION OF THE CITY BOUNDARIES.
SO IN TOTAL, THERE'S APPROXIMATELY 4.32 ACRES OF LAND, AGAIN, CONSISTING OF 11 PARCELS, 10 OF WHICH ARE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND ONE COMMON STORM WATER POND FOR THE SUBDIVISION. AGAIN, THE CITY IS REQUESTING ASSIGNMENT OF THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY AND THE R-1 ZONING DISTRICT.
CURRENTLY THE PROPERTIES HAVE A NASSAU COUNTY RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY 2 ZONING AND NASSAU COUNTY MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL WHICH MOST CLOSELY ALIGNS WITH THE CITY'S R-1 LAND USE AND ZONING REQUIREMENTS THAT WE'RE REQUESTING TONIGHT. THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION IS COMPLIANT WITH ALL OF THE APPLICABLE FLORIDA STATE STATUTES, CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
ALL OF THESE PROPERTIES, WHETHER REDEVELOPING OR EXPANDING, WOULD HAVE TO COMPLY WITH CITY ZONING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE R-1 ZONING DISTRICT. AND AS SUCH, FOR PAB CASE 2020-0008, STAFF REQUESTS STATES ACTION IS CONSISTENT WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION ASSIGNED AS A LOW DENSITY FUTURE CATEGORY IN THE R-1 ZONING DISTRICT. FOLLOWING TONIGHT'S RECOMMENDATION, THESE WILL APPEAR AS THREE SEPARATE ORDINANCES, ANTICIPATED FOR THE
OCTOBER 20TH CITY COMMISSION MEETING. >> ALL RIGHT.
SO WE MAY HAVE SOME PUBLIC SPEAKERS HERE TONIGHT ON THIS, BUT WHAT I'D LIKE TO DO FIRST IS OPEN IT UP TO THE BOARD FOR QUESTIONS. AND THEN AT THAT POINT, WE'LL OPEN IT UP TO THE PUBLIC FOR QUESTIONS. AND AS A REMINDER, IF YOU'RE SPEAKING FROM THE PUBLIC SIDE, PLEASE REMEMBER TO GIVE US YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS AND THEN WE'RE HAPPY TO TAKE YOUR COMMENTS AND HELP ANY WAY WE CAN IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ON THIS.
LET'S OPEN IT UP TO THE FLOOR FIRST. LET'S GO TO THE SCREEN.
CAN WE SEE EVERYBODY? WHO HAS QUESTIONS?
MISS ROBAS, DID YOU HAVE A QUESTION? >> NO, MA'AM.
>> ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE MEMBERS ON THE SCREEN? NOPE.
ANY QUESTIONS FROM MEMBERS IN THE ROOM? >> I JUST GOT A QUICKIE.
IF YOU GO TO THE FIRST PAGE OF THE ACTUAL REQUEST, VERY LAST LINE ON THAT PAGE.
IT WOULD BE PAGE 1 OF YOUR ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. LOOK DOWN THAT LAST LINE.
IT SAYS "THE IS THE." JUST TAKE OUT "IS THE." WHERE IT SAYS "THE DESIGNATION
IS THE IS THE." THAT'S IT. >> OKAY.
>> I CAN'T TAKE IT OUT OF THIS PARTICULAR -- >> DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT.
[00:15:02]
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ARE THERE ANY SPEAKERS HERE IN THE ROOM THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK OR ON ZOOM? MISS WHITAKER, RIGHT? ARE YOU HEAR TO SPEAK ON THIS
ONE OR ANOTHER ONE? YES, MA'AM? >> HEARING NO OTHER QUESTIONS OR
COMMENTS, THE CHAIR WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> MADAM CHAIR, I MAKE A MOTION.
I MOVE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PAB2020-0008 TO CITY COMMISSION REQUESTING A VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION ASSIGNMENT OF THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE CATEGORY IN R-1 ZONING DISTRICT BE APPROVED AND PAB2020-0008 AS PRESENTED IS SUFFICIENTLY COMPLY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND APPLICABLE FLORIDA STATUTES TO BE APPROVED AT THIS TIME.
>> IS THERE A SECOND? >> I WILL SECOND. >> GOT IT.
ANY FINAL QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE, WE'LL VOTE. EITHER SAY YAY OR RAISE YOUR
>> OKAY. THE MOTION CARRIES. WE HAVE THE NEXT ONE.
>> YES, MA'AM. SO AGAIN PAB CASE 2020-0009 IS AN APPLICATION FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION SMALL SCALE FUTURE LAND USE ASSIGNMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT.
THERE ARE TWO SUBJECT PARCELS HERE. 2246 SADLER ROAD WHERE THERE'S AN EXISTING RECENTLY CONSTRUCTED 103 ROOM HOTEL, HOME TO SUITES HOTEL BY HILTON.
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SADLER ROAD WHICH HAS AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME.
THE WATER AND SEWER RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE SERVICES OUTSIDE CORPORATE LIMITS FOR 2246 SADLER ROAD WAS APPROVED THROUGH 2017-193. THIS ALLOWED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE 103-ROOM HOME TO SUITES HILTON. 2233 SADLER ROAD ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SADHRER WHERE THE HOME IS LOCATED REQUESTED ANNEXATION IN JUNE 2020 WHEN THEIR SEPTIC SYSTEM FAILED. WE HAVE THAT SIGNED AGREEMENT AND THE CITY EXTENDED THOSE SERVICES TO CONNECT TO THE SEWER AN ALLEVIATE THEIR PROBLEM AT THAT PARTICULAR TIME.
I HAVE GOT A TABLE WITH ALL THE VARIOUS LAND USE AND ZONING. I'LL GO TO A MAP THAT SHOWS THE CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING MAP OF NASSAU COUNTY. CURRENTLY, THIS AREA ON SADLER ROAD HAS A FUTURE LAND USE OF COMMERCIAL ON THE COUNTY. ON THE LEFT-HAND SIDE YOU CAN SEE THE NASSAU COUNTY ZONING MAP. YOU CAN SEE REFERENCES TO VARIOUS ORDINANCES AND THE PURPLE SHADE IS RESIDENTIAL ZONING.
MOST OF THE RECENT, OR COUPLE, 2018 ZONING MAP CHANGES, THOSE CORRECTED THE MISMATCH BETWEEN THE NASSAU COUNTY LAND USE AND ZONING MAP AND PROVIDED A NASSAU COUNTY GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING. ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SADLER ROAD -- KEEP GETTING THE ADDRESSES WRONG. THE 2246, THE HOTEL. CITY IS REQUESTING A GENERAL LAND USE C-1 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL ZONE. ON THE NORTH SIDE, THE CITY IS REQUESTING ASSIGNMENT OF A MIXED USE LAND USE CATEGORY. NOW, THIS LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATION WILL INTRODUCE RESIDENTIAL, CITY'S RESIDENTIAL DENSITY OF EIGHT DWELLING UNITS AN ACRE AND ALLOW FOR THOSE ANCILLARY COMMERCIAL USES THAT ARE PERMISSIBLE IN THE MU-1 ZONING DISTRICT. THIS WILL ALSO PROVIDE FOR A ZONING THAT DOESN'T CREATE A NONPERFORMANCE SITUATION WITH REGARD TO THE EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME.
I HAVE REFERENCED THE APPLICABLE POLICIES, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CODE IN THE STAFF REPORT.
CITY IS ABLE TO SERVE BOTH OF THESE PROPERTIES. AS SUCH, STAFF, THE REQUESTED
[00:20:11]
ACTION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF GENERAL FUTURE LAND USE FOR COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FOR 2246 SADLER ROAD AND ASSIGNMENT OF MIXED USE FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR 2233 SADLER ROAD.
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OF THE BOARD'S QUESTION AT THIS TIME. >> AGAIN, WE'RE GOING TO TAKE QUESTIONS OF THE BOARD FIRST AND THEN OPEN IT UP TO THE PUBLIC. LET'S GO TO THE MEMBERS ON THE SCREEN. SO WHAT QUESTIONS DO PEOPLE HAVE? HEARING NONE, I WILL GO TO THE ROOM. WHAT QUESTIONS DO BOARD MEMBERS
HAVE HERE IN THE ROOM? >> JACOB, I JUST GOT ONE. CAN WE GO BACK TO THAT LAST MAP THAT YOU SHOWED? ALL RIGHT. IF YOU DO THE LEFT HALF OF THE SCREEN, I'LL CALL IT THE GOLDISH, YELLOWISH OUTLINE UP THERE.
THAT'S NOW ALL CITY PROPERTY, RIGHT? EVERYTHING INSIDE THAT?
>> EVERYTHING INSIDE THE MIDDLE OF THE SCREEN AND THAT YELLOW BOUNDARIES IS COUNTY.
EVERYTHING TO THE LEFT AND THE RIGHT OF THOSE IS CITY. SO WHEN COMPARING THE ZONING MAP ON YOUR RIGHT, ALL CITY PROPERTIES ARE COLORED WITH THE APPLICABLE ZONING DISTRICT.
PROPERTIES ON THE LEFT LOCATED OFF, OR KIND OF CENTRALLY OFF RYAN ROAD, ALL THOSE ARE COUNTY PROPERTIES. THAT'S WHY WE'RE ASSIGNING AN ANNEX.
>> WHERE THE ICE CREAM IS, THAT'S STILL COUNTY? >> IT IS.
>> OKAY. OKAY. I JUST WASN'T SURE.
SO THE HOTEL IS NOW CITY, BUT JUST MIXED ORDINANCE COUNTY? >> CORRECT.
APPROVAL OF THIS WOULD BRING THE HOTEL INTO THE CITY. >> RIGHT.
>> OKAY. >> SO IF THERE ARE NO MORE QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD, I WOULD OPEN IT UP TO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC? IF YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK OR HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS, IF YOU'D PLEASE GO TO THE PODIUM AND STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS
AND THEN WE'LL BE GLAD TO HEAR YOUR QUESTION. >> I'M SORRY, I'M NOT
UNDERSTANDING HARDLY ANYTHING THAT HE SAID. >> IF YOU WOULD GO TO THE
PODIUM. >> OKAY. >> AND GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, THEN WE'LL HELP YOU FIGURE OUT HOW TO UNDERSTAND THIS BETTER.
IT IS CONFUSING. >> OKAY. I'M MILDRED WHITAKER.
WE OPEN THE PROPERTY 22 -- >> YOUR ADDRESS, MISS WHITAKER? >> 222 LIGHTHOUSE CIRCLE.
BUT WE OWN THE PROPERTY AT 2209 SADLER, WHICH IS KIND OF ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE HOTEL.
TWO OR THREE PROPERTIES NORTH, I MEAN WEST, OF THE PIECE ACROSS THE STREET.
MY QUESTION IS, DEFINE MULTIPLE U USE.
>> SO THE ACTION THE CITY IS REQUESTING -- >> I'LL COME OVER THERE.
I CAN'T HEAR YOU. >> OKAY. >> THE MIXED USE --
>> THESE MASKS DON'T HELP MUCH. >> NO, MA'AM. THE MIXED USE LAND DESIGNATION
AND ZONING DISTRICT ALLOWS FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES. >> OKAY.
THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT. >> SO YOU COULD HAVE A SINGLE FAMILY HOME THAT IS THERE TODAY AND YOU COULD HAVE COMMERCIAL STAND ALONE OR TOGETHER WITH RESIDENTIAL AT A MAXIMUM DENSITY
OF 81 UNITS AN ACRE. >> BASICALLY IT JUST BROADENS THE EAST.
>> IT DOES. IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, IT DOES.
>> YEAH, OKAY. SO IT SHOULD GIVE ME AS WELL AS THEM MORE OPTIONS AS TO WHAT TO
USE OUR PROPERTY MORE. >> SO THIS ACTION TONIGHT DOES NOT AFFECT YOUR PROPERTY AT ALL.
IT'S ONLY -- >> MINE IS MULTIPLE USE ALREADY, ISN'T IT?
>> NO, MA'AM. IN THE COUNTY, IT'S GOT A MIXED -- LET ME PULL IT UP.
I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE COUNTY, BUT I DO HAVE THEIR MAP HERE.
AND THIS DOES NOT HAVE THE ADDRESSES ON IT. BUT I BELIEVE YOUR PROPERTY HAS A COMMERCIAL FUTURE LAND USE AND A RESIDENTIAL ZONING. SO THERE'S A CONFLICT THERE THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE CORRECTED IF YOU WERE DOING ANY KIND OF EXPANSION OF YOUR PROPERTY IN
THE COUNTY. >> OKAY. SO IF I DECIDE THAT I WANTED TO
PUT A BUSINESS THERE, IT'S OKAY BECAUSE IT'S COMMERCIAL. >> YOU'D HAVE TO TALK TO THE
[00:25:09]
CITY. >> ANYTHING I DO ON IT, I'M GOING TO HAVE TO GET A PERMIT?
>> RIGHT NOW ANYTHING YOU WANT TO DO YOU HAVE TO GO TO THE COUNTY.
WE HAVE NO CONTROL OVER YOUR PROPERTY. >> SEE, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT I HAVE MISUNDERSTOOD ALL THESE YEARS. I UNDERSTOOD THAT EVERYTHING ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF SADLER ROAD WAS CITY. >> NO, MA'AM.
>> DO YOU HAVE A HOUSE ON YOUR PROPERTY THERE NOW? >> NO.
WE HAD A DOUBLE TRAILER, BUT IT WAS A HOUSE. WHAT DO YOU CALL THEM?
>> MODULAR. >> SO RIGHT NOW YOU'RE ON SEPTIC.
>> I'M SORRY? >> YOU'RE ON SEPTIC TANK? >> YEAH.
>> SO IF YOU WANTED TO COME ON THE SEWER, YOU COULD ASK TO BE ANNEXED IN.
IF YOU WANT TO BE WITHIN THE CITY RULES FOR LAND USE, YOU COULD ASK FOR A VOLUNTARY
ANNEXATION. >> SO BASICALLY, WHATEVER I DO WITH IT, I JUST NEED TO WAIT AND
THEN COME BACK TO YOU. >> IF YOU WANTED TO DO SOMETHING WITH IT TODAY, YOU'D HAVE TO BE TALKING TO THE COUNTY, NOT TO US. UNLESS YOU WANTED TO COME INTO
THE CITY AND THEN YOU TALK TO MISS BACH. >> YOU'RE ANNEXING THE PROPERTY
THE HOTEL IS ON. OKAY. >> BECAUSE THEY ARE ON WATER AND
SEWER. >> THAT CLEARS UP THINGS. I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM UNTIL I
GET READY TO DO SOMETHING. >> GET YOUR PURSE, MISS WHITAKER.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE, I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
>> I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE PAB CASE 2020-0009 AS PRESENTED AND AS WRITTEN.
>> IS THERE A SECOND? IS THERE A SECOND? >> SECOND.
>> MISS ROBAS SECONDS IT. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE OR RAISE YOUR HAND. I CAN'T SEE EVERYBODY. EVERYBODY RAISE YOUR HAND, PLEASE. OKAY. THANK YOU.
ALL RIGHT. ONE MORE. >> ONE MORE.
PAB CASE 2020-0010 IS A VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION AGREEMENT. THIS IS A LARGE SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP ASSIGNMENT AND ZONING CHANGE. THIS REQUEST TOTALS APPROXIMATELY 31.39 ACRES OF LAND AND IT IS AN ACCUMULATION, OR ALL OF THE MEDICAL CENTER OF NASSAU COUNTY OFF LIME STREET, OFF SOUTH 18TH STREET. THE EXTENSION OF SERVICES WAS APPROVED THROUGH RESOLUTION 2013-186 AND IT WAS RELATED TO THE EXPANSION OF THE HOSPITAL FACILITIES. SHORTLY AFTER THAT RESOLUTION TO EXTEND THE SERVICES, THE CITY AMENDED THE SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARD SECTION OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ACCOUNT FOR THE OFF SITE SIGNAGE THAT IS NEEDED FOR THE HOSPITAL AND TO AMEND THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT TO 60 FEET TO ACCOMMODATE THE HOSPITAL'S NEEDS. THAT WAS APPROVED THROUGH ORDINANCE 2014-21. TONIGHT'S ASSIGNMENT, THE REQUESTED ACTION IS ASSIGNMENT OF PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL LAND USE CATEGORY AND A ZONING DISTRICT OF PI1.
CURRENTLY THE PROPERTY HAS A FUTURE LAND USE OF PUBLIC BUILDING GROUNDS IN THE COUNTY AND A NASSAU COUNTY COMMERCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DESIGNATION.
AGAIN, I HAVE LISTED THE APPLICABLE ORDINANCES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND FIND THIS VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION IS COMPLIANT WITH THE APPLICABLE STATE STATUTE, CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION, ASSIGNMENT OF FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL ZONING DISTRICT. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OF THE
QUESTIONS THE BOARD HAS. >> OPEN IT UP FOR QUESTIONS. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ON THE
[00:30:03]
JACOB, I THINK I'M READING THIS CORRECTLY. DO I INTERPRET THE FACT THAT THIS ANNEXATION WILL INCLUDE THE OLD COUNCIL ON AGING BUILDING ON 18TH STREET AS NECTARINE?>> YES, IT WILL. >> THE HOSPITAL NOW OWNS THAT. >> OKAY.
ALL RIGHT. ANY MORE QUESTIONS? THE CHAIR WOULD ENTERTAIN A
MOTION. SOMEBODY MAKE A MOTION. >> I'LL MAKE A MOTION.
>> I THINK, MISS ROBAS DID. >> MADAM CHAIR, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PAB CASE NUMBER 2020-0010 TO CITY COMMISSION REQUESTING THAT A VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION ASSIGNMENT OF THE PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL FUTURE LAND USE MAP CATEGORY AND PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL ZONING DISTRICT BE APPROVED PAB CASE 2020-0010 AS PRESENTED IS SUFFICIENTLY COMPLIANT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODEC TO BE APPROVED AT THIS TIME.
>> A SECOND. >> I WILL SECOND. >> SECOND.
>> YOU CAN GET YOUR VOTE. I JUST WANT TO MENTION SOMETHING.
>> ARE WE READY TO VOTE? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY YES OR RAISE YOUR HAND.
ALL THOSE OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES. THANK YOU, JAKE.
>> I JUST WANTED TO MENTION, IN CASE SOME OF YOU DON'T KNOW. I DON'T THINK THEY HAVE ANY PLANS FOR THIS IN THE NEAR FUTURE, BUT KELLY AND I HAVE ALREADY SPOKEN WITH THE ATTORNEY THAT'S REPRESENTING THE HOSPITAL. THEY HAD SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ANNEXATION. IT'S BEEN ABOUT FIVE OR SIX YEARS SINCE THEY SIGNED THE AGREEMENT. THE LEADERSHIP AT THE HOSPITAL HAS ALL CHANGED SINCE WE'VE DONE THE AGREEMENT. SO THEY HAD SOME QUESTIONS. ONE OF THE THINGS IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE THAT WAS PROVIDED SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS TYPE OF USE, REALLY THIS SPECIFIC USE, THE HOSPITAL, IS THAT THEY CAN GO UP TO 60 FEET IN HEIGHT.
SO I WOULDN'T WANT SOME DAY, I JUST WANT TO PUT THAT OUT THERE SO SOME DAY IF THEY DO EXPAND UPWARDS AND WE SEE THIS REALLY TALL BUILDING, THEY ARE PERMITTED TO HAVE THAT USE.
THAT WAS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT ENTICED THEM TO WORK SO CLOSELY WITH THE CITY.
THEY NEEDED WATER, SEWER AND GAS, BUT THAT TYPE OF ORGANIZATION, THEY HAVE ALTERNATIVES, MORE SO THAN SOME INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNERS. SO THEY DID GET THAT.
IF WE SEE A TALL HOSPITAL, I DOUBT IT WOULD HAVE TO BE 60 FEET, BUT THEY CAN GO THAT HIGH.
>> THANK YOU. >> I'LL JUST MAKE A COMMENT THAT ALSO KEEPS THEM IN PARITY OF
WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN ON THE ISLAND. >> CORRECT. THESE REALLY HAVE BEEN -- ALMOST LIKE A LITTLE BIT OF CLEANUP, SOME THINGS THAT HAPPENED A WHILE BACK.
NOW WE'RE JUST CATCHING EVERYTHING UP. THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR WORK ON
[6. BOARD BUSINESS]
THIS. BOARD BUSINESS. WE HAVE COUPLE OF ITEMS.CAN WE TALK ABOUT THE ZONING >> I'LL COVER THAT ITEM, IF THAT'S OKAY.
I HAVEN'T PROVIDED TO YOU THAT I REVISED SHEET FOR A COUPLE OF REASONS.
THERE ARE A COUPLE OF PROPERTIES THAT I'M BEING A LITTLE MORE SENSITIVE AND CAUTIOUS WITH BEFORE THROWING OUT THERE A LIST OF PROPERTIES. I WANTED TO FIRST TOUCH BASE WITH THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS TO LET THEM KNOW ABOUT THIS BEFORE IT WAS APPEARING ON A PUBLIC FORUM. JUST OUT OF A MATTER OF COURTESY.
I WOULD APPRECIATE THE EXTRA TIME TO GET IN TOUCH WITH THEM FIRST.
>> OKAY. SO WHEN WOULD YOU EXPECT US TO SEE THIS?
>> I'M HOPING YOU CAN SEE IT AT THE NEXT MEETING. THERE'S JUST TWO PROPERTY OWNERS I'M TRYING TO GET IN TOUCH WITH. OTHERS WERE PART OF A LARGER SUBDIVISION.
WHERE IT'S ISOLATED, I'M DOING A LITTLE MORE WORK. >> AND TRACKING CASES.
DO YOU WANT TO JUST TALK TO US A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE ACTIVITIES THAT ARE GOING ON WITH THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT. >> SURE. I CAN PROVIDE A GENERAL OVERVIEW. THE TRACKING DOCUMENT ITSELF IS THE FACT THAT WE HAVE SOME NEW STAFF MEMBERS. ONE OLD STAFF MEMBER HAS RETURNED TO OUR DISTRICT COUNCIL. HE IS COMING BACK FOR ALL THE BOARD ACTIVITY.
THAT BOARD IS VERY BUSY IN THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, AS YOU'LL NOTE IN THE TRACKING TOOL.
SO MUCH SO THAT WE'VE HAD TO SPREAD IT INTO TWO SEPARATE BOARD MEETINGS IN ORDER TO COVER ALL OF THE CASES WITHOUT HAVING EXHAUSTION OF THE BOARD MEMBERS. SECOND REALLY EXCITING OPPORTUNITY WE HAVE IS TO WORK WITH MRS. TAYLOR HARTMAN COMING IN FOR PLANNING AND JUST RECENTLY JOINED US YESTERDAY. YOU WILL SEE HER AT ALL OF OUR BOARD MEETINGS, THE BOARD
[00:35:04]
LIAISON FOR EACH BOARD. NOT THE FULL BOARD LIAISON, BUT AS A SECRETARY CHAIRING IT.WE WILL BE HELPING GET HER ALL PREPARED AND UP TO SPEED ON ALL OF OUR ACTIVITIES.
YOU HAVE ONE BOARD CASE BEFORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS THIS MONTH AND THEN THE ACTIONS YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU. NEXT MONTH WILL BE ANOTHER ANNEXATION REQUEST, BUT OF A
MUCH SMALLER PROPERTY. >> OKAY. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
OR COMMENTS ON THE BOARD REPORT? >> JUST A GENERAL COMMENT. >> OKAY.
>> AS FAR AS THAT CHALLENGE ON THE RFP, I TAKE IT THAT'S DEAD, GONE?
>> GONE. >> OKAY. >> SO WE WILL BE ABLE TO CONDUCT
OUR MEETING WITHOUT CONCERN ON THE 23RD. >> OKAY.
ALL RIGHT. MY NEXT QUESTION, BASED ON WHAT HAPPENED LAST NIGHT, BASED ON WHAT LEN KREIGER, LAND CODE UP DATES AND SO FORTH. IS THAT MONEY STILL IN THE BUDGET OR NOT? I NEVER HEARD ANYBODY SAY TAKE IT OUT OR CHALLENGE IT.
MADE A COMMENT AND IT JUST KIND OF HUSHED UP AND WENT AWAY. >> I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE NEXT STEP WILL BE, IF THERE WOULD BE A REVISION TO ACCOUNT FOR THAT AND IT WOULD BE PRESENTED AT
FINAL BUDGET. DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENT ON THAT? >> IT IS STILL IN THE BUDGET.
THERE'S $90,000. >> $80,000 IN SALARY AND ABOUT ANOTHER $10,000 IN EXPENSES.
SO RIGHT AROUND $90,000. $87,000, $88,000. >> LAST NIGHT AT THE MEETING, SOMETIMES IT'S CONFUSING WHEN THEY DON'T VOTE, AND JUST A BACKGROUND.
IN FLORIDA YOU CAN ADOPT A BUDGET BY ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION.
WE USED TO DO IT BY ORDINANCE. HAVE TWO VOTES, ONE AT EACH PUBLIC HEARING.
NOW WE ADOPT BY RESOLUTION. THAT'S BEEN ABOUT THREE OR FOUR YEARS, SO THERE'S ONLY ONE VOTE NEEDED, AND THAT VOTE IS TAKEN AT THE NEXT MEETING, WHICH WILL BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 28 AND THEY WILL APPROVE THE BUDGET AND POTENTIALLY MAKE CHANGES. SO LAST NIGHT MR. KREIGER, MR. LEDNOVICH AGREEING WITH THE CUTS HE STATED. NOTHING HAS CHANGED.
THE CITY MANAGER IS NOT TAKING ANY ACTION TO CREATE A NEW BUDGET DOCUMENT BECAUSE IT WAS ONLY TWO. THE OTHER THREE CITY COMMISSIONERS DIDN'T MAKE ANY COMMENT, SO THE MANAGER WOULDN'T TAKE ACTION BASED ON THAT. AT THE FINAL MEETING WE'LL SEE IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES MADE TO THE BUDGETED ITEMS INCLUDING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS.
SO RIGHT NOW IT'S STILL IN THE BUDGET, BUT WE'RE NOT SURE IF THE COMMISSION -- AND EVEN, AS YOU KNOW, IF IT'S IN THE BUDGET DOESN'T MEAN IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN.
THAT WILL BE CONTROLLED I THINK THROUGH YOUR PROCESS. YOU ALL ARE GOING TO HAVE INPUT INTO THAT. FOR NOW I SUSPECT IT WILL STAY. IF I HAVE TO GUESS WHAT'S GOING
TO HAPPEN ON THE 28TH, I THINK IT'S GOING TO STAY IN THERE. >> WHAT I HAVE TALKED WITH MR. MARTIN ABOUT SPECIFICALLY IS NOT NECESSARILY IN PERSON, BUT REALLOCATE THAT FUND MONEY OUT OF HEAD COUNT MONEY AND PUT IT INTO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S BUDGET.
>> RIGHT. >> WHICH HE'S NOT BEEN OPPOSED TO IN GENERAL CONVERSATION.
I THINK THAT THERE IS ALWAYS TIME TO COME BACK SOON, AFTER OUR 23RD MEETING, WITH SOME VIEW ON HOW WE COULD PROCEED FORWARD WITH THIS PROJECT FOR NEXT YEAR. I THINK EVERYONE AGREES THAT IT IS AN IMPORTANT PROJECT. IT'S JUST HOW WE SCOPE IT AND HOW WE MANAGE THE FUNDING FOR IT. WE MAY SPEND A LITTLE LESS MONEY AND TAKE A LITTLE MORE TIME.
WE MAY RELY MORE ON STAFF AND CITY VOLUNTEERS AND USE CONSULTANTS IN A MUCH MORE TARGETED WAY. REGARDLESS, ABILITY TO NEGOTIATE WITH THOSE VENDORS IS CLEARLY AVAILABLE TO US AND WE CAN NEGOTIATE WITH THEM ON ALMOST A PER ITEM BASIS, IF THAT'S THE
PREFERENCE OF THE BOARD AS WE GO FORWARD. >> I THINK THE CITY MANAGER, FROM WHAT I KNOW, IS LOOKING FOR YOUR DIRECTION, AND SO IS THE CITY COMMISSION, ABOUT WHICH WAY
TO GO. >> OKAY. IN THE 500,000 THEY DISCUSSED
LAST NIGHT, THAT'S STILL, QUOTE, IN THE BUDGET RIGHT NOW THEN? >> FOR WHAT?
>> FOR THOSE TWO CAPITAL PROJECTS. >> YES, YES.
EVERYTHING THAT WAS MENTIONED BY VICE MAYOR KREIGER IS STILL IN THE BUDGET.
HE SAID HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE A CUT AND MILITARY, NO ACTION TAKEN.
IF THERE WAS AN ACTION, THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE A VOTE. THERE ARE NO MEETINGS OTHER THAN
[00:40:08]
SEPTEMBER 8 AT 5:05. >> OKAY. THANK YOU.
>> ALL RIGHT. I HAVE ONE -- ARE WE GOOD WITH ALL OF THAT? I HAVE ONE NEW ITEM OF BOARD BUSINESS TO DISCUSS. FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT WERE AT THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING, YOU MAY KNOW THAT AT THE LAST COMMISSION MEETING, COMMISSIONER ROSS, THERE WAS A LENGTHY CONVERSATION ABOUT BEACH, BEACH MANAGEMENT, BEACH ACCESS MANAGEMENT, WALKOVER, THE COST OF WALKOVERS, JUST THE WHOLE GENERAL APPROACH TO THE BEACH MANAGEMENT. AND SUBSEQUENT TO THAT, COMMISSIONER ROSS WROTE A LETTER AND A VIEWPOINT THAT WAS IN THE PAPER AND I HAVE HAD A COUPLE CONVERSATIONS WITH HIM WHERE HE'S ASKED FOR SOME SORT OF COMMITTEE TO TAKE ON THE WHOLE ISSUE OF BEACH MANAGEMENT, DO A REAL PLAN, PUT TOGETHER HOW WE -- YOU KNOW, JUST THE WHOLE APPROACH.
WHAT WE WOULD DO ABOUT FUNDING, ABOUT COST? THESE GREAT BIG LONG WALKOVERS THAT ARE A COUPLE HUNDRED, 300 FEET LONG. THEY'RE VERY EXPENSIVE TO INSTALL AND MAINTAIN. IS THAT WHAT WE WANT TO CONTINUE WITH OR CAN WE DO SOMETHING ELSE? SO I HAD A CONVERSATION WITH HIM.
I HAD A CONVERSATION WITH COMMISSIONER KREIGER AS WELL, WHETHER OR NOT THEY THOUGHT IT WAS SOMETHING THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO SEE US TAKE ON. THEY BOTH INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD. AND TODAY, THIS AFTERNOON, KELLY RECEIVED AN E-MAIL FROM MR. MARTIN, WHICH SHE FORWARDED IT ON TO ME, ASKING US TO CREATE A COMMITTEE.
AS EARLIER DISCUSSED TODAY I AM EXPLORING THE FORMATION OF COMMITTEE TO ASSIST WITH DEVELOPMENT OF A BEACH ACCESS PLAN WALK THROUGH AND WALKOVERS AND SINCE BEACH ACCESS IS A COME POEPBMENT OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I WOULD LIKE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD TO SERVE AS CHAIR OF THIS COMMITTEE, STAFF SUPPORT COME FROM THE YET TO BE APPOINTED CITY ENGINEER.
ONCE THAT APPOINTMENT BEGINS WITH THE CITY WE CAN DETERMINE HOW TO ADD INTERESTED PARTIES, THE GENERAL INTENT TO DEVELOP A PLAN INCLUDING PRIORITIES AND FUNDING FOR FUTURE BEACH ACCESS PLANNING. AND SO WITH THIS E-MAIL AND AFTER DISCUSSION, WE HAVE ASKED MISS ROBAS IF SHE WOULD BE SO KIND AS TO CHAIR THIS COMMITTEE AND THERE WILL BE A LOT OF CAT HERDING, I THINK, GOING ON. I THINK MISS ROBAS WOULD BE IN A GREAT POSITION TO CHAIR THIS COMMITTEE AND WORK THROUGH THIS. I THINK IT WILL BE SEVERAL MONTHS IN THE MAKING AND GOOD AM OF CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT IN UNDERSTANDING WHAT WE NEED TO BE DOING WITH THAT.
THAT IS SOMETHING THAT THE BOARD HAS TAKEN ON AND WE WILL, ONCE THE COMMITTEE GETS UP AND RUNNING, WILL ASK MISS ROBAS TO GIVE US REGULAR REPORTS ON HOW THAT IS GOING.
OF COURSE, AS WITH ALL PUBLIC MEETINGS, ANYONE IN THE BOARD WHO WOULD LIKE TO BE INVOLVED IN THAT IS WELCOME TO ATTEND MEETINGS AND WHATEVER. SO THAT'S THE OTHER BIG NEWS THAT'S GOING ON RIGHT NOW, JUST FOR EVERYONE'S INFORMATION. YES, MISS GINGHER?
>> YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE COUNTY LINE, CORRECT?
>> YEP. THE WHOLE CITY. >> OKAY.
>> YES. >> THANK YOU. >> ALL 48 WALKOVERS.
ALL RIGHT. DOES ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANY BOARD BUSINESS THEY'D LIKE TO DISCUSS
OR BRING UP? >> THIS IS JUST KIND OF TALKING ABOUT OUR WORK SHOP COMING UP IN TWO WEEKS. THERE ARE MULTIPLE VERSIONS OF THE CODES, WHAT'S ON THE INTERNET IS ABOUT A 2016 VERSION. WHAT I HAVE GOT IN THE BOOK IS A
2019 VERSION. DOES IT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE? >> WHEN YOU SAY CODE, YOU MEAN
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE OR SITE PLAN? >> LAND DEVELOPMENT TODAY.
>> LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SHOULD BE UPDATED AS OF JULY 2020. >> NOT ON THE INFORMATION THAT
WAS SENT OUT TO US. >> THE COMP PLAN MIGHT READ DIFFERENTLY, BUT THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. IS THERE A REPRINT DATE AT THE BOTTOM THAT WOULD READ REPRINT
[00:45:01]
AND THEN HAVE JULY 2020. >> OKAY. LET ME SEE HERE.
>> I CAN PRINT YOU A COPY. >> ALL RIGHT. THIS WAS FEBRUARY 2019.
>> THAT IS DEFINITELY AN UPDATE. >> AND WHAT WAS SENT OUT TO EVERYBODY ON THE BOARD IS A SOFT
COPY IS 2016. >> WHAT I SENT YOU IS THE LINK THAT SHOULD BE UPDATED.
WE'LL GET UPDATED AS WE MAKE THAT. >> NOW IF I JUST GO ON AND TYPE IN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE UNDER THE CITY TO BRING IT UP, IT'S THE 2016 VERSION SHOWS UP ON THE
WEB. >> IF YOU GO ON THE CITY'S MAIN WEBSITE AND ENTER FORWARD SLASH LDC FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, IT WILL TAKE YOU TO A MAIN WEBSITE.
THEN IN THERE YOU'LL SEE THE DIFFERENT CHAPTERS BY LINK. AND YOU CAN LOOK AT THEM INDIVIDUALLY. I AM LOOKING AT CHAPTER 1 AS AN EXAMPLE, AND IT READS REPRINT
JULY 2020. >> OKAY. THERE'S SOMETHING -- LET ME --
>> SO IF YOU GO TO THE MAIN PLANNING AND CONSERVATION FRONT PAGE, YOU CAN CLICK ON THE COMP PLAN LDC, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THAT GIVES YOU THE INDIVIDUAL CHAPTERS.
THAT SAYS EFFECTIVE DATE OCTOBER 1ST. IF YOU GO DOWN AND LOOK AT THE DATE CHANGES, THERE WERE DATE CHANGES FOR MAY 2020, REPRINTED DATE 2020 IS WHAT'S ON THE
WEBSITE TODAY. >> OKAY. SEE WHERE IT SAYS LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE. >> GO DOWN. THESE LINKS HERE.
>> I'M JUST PICKING CHAPTER 6. OKAY. IT SAYS REPRINT MAY 2016.
>> THAT'S BECAUSE THERE HAVE BEEN NO CHANGES AFTER 2016. >> IF YOU CLICK ON THE COVER
PAGE ON THE TOP PAGE. >> OKAY. >> IT SAYS REPRINT DATE MAY 2020. IF YOU MADE CHANGES IN JULY, IT SHOULD HAVE SHOWN UP HERE.
>> THERE YOU GO. IT'S JUST BECAUSE CERTAIN CHAPTERS DIDN'T GET UPDATED.
>> RIGHT. >> THERE WEREN'T ANY CHANGES. >> OKAY.
OKAY. >> THE COVER PAGE SHOULD HAVE BEEN UPDATED, KELLY.
LDC COVER PAGE. >> NEEDS TO BE UPDATED AS OF JULY.
ACTUALLY JUNE. >> I WAS LOOKING AT 6 ONLY BECAUSE THAT HAD THE HOSPITAL STUFF. I WAS LOOKING AT THAT 60 FOOT THING AND SAID, OH.
>> THAT'S CORRECT. IT WAS AMENDED FOR SEPTEMBER. >> OKAY?
>> ALL RIGHT. WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS GOOD. OKAY.
ALL RIGHT. >> THAT'S CORRECT. >> ALL RIGHT.
THAT WAS THE ONLY THING I HAD. YOU REALLY DO NEED TO LOOK AT THE COVER ON IT.
OKAY. ALL RIGHT. >> ALL RIGHT.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? HEARING NONE, I GUESS WE WILL SEE EVERYBODY ON THE 23RD IN THIS ROOM AT 5 P.M. WE'RE GONNA SET UP DOWN THERE TABLES, SO HOPEFULLY WE CAN ALL
PARTICIPATE, RIGHT, KELLY? >> YES. >> WE'LL BE SET UP DOWN THERE ON TABLES SO WE CAN SET UP. HEARING NO OTHER COMMENTS, WE WILL CALL THIS MEETING ADJOURNED IN 48 MINUTES. NO
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.