[00:00:11]
>>> WE ARE ON TO THE APPROVAL OF MINUTES. HIGH HAVE THE MINUTES IN THE
[Item 4]
PACKET FROM THE JUNE 11 REGULAR MEETING FOR YOUR REVIEW. >> POINT OF ORDER, CAN I NOT APPROVE THIS? IT NEEDS TO BE RAISED BY SOMEBODY ELSE? IS THAT THE CASE? I THINK I'D MOVED THIS UP LAST MONTH.
>> A MOTION AND A SECOND WOULD HAVE TO BE ANYBODY BUT THE CHAIR >> OKAY.
SO CAN SOMEBODY BELIEVE THIS IS CORRECT AND WHEN THEY MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THESE.
>> MAKE A MOTION THAT WE ACCEPT THE MINUTES AS WRITTEN. >> SECOND.
>> THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED. >> CANNOT GET AN ALL IN FOR? >> AYE.
>> NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS A PUBLIC COMMENT. I'M GOING TO ADD IN ONE NOTE BEFORE WE GO TO PUBLIC COMMENTS. WE ALL HAVE A FACE MASK ON HERE SO IF ANY POINT YOU HAVE TROUBLE HEARING PLEASE FEEL FREE TO YELL AT ME. IT MAY MUFFLE MY VOICE.
I HAVE NOBODY IN THE ROOM TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT THAT I CAN SEE AND THEY DON'T BELIEVE WE HAVE ANYBODY ON IN THE ZOOM MEETING INTENDING TO PROVIDE ALL THE COMMENTS.
I BELIEVE WE JUST MOVE ON. >> OKAY. >> GO AHEAD.
>> DAVID BROUGHTON JUST JOINED JUST -- JOINED US. >> HELLO, DAVE.
>> HELLO. >> WE ARE AT THE MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT.
[Item 6.1]
NOTHING SIGNIFICANT TO REPORTS FROM OUR DISCUSSION ON THIS AT THE LAST MEETING.I WILL GIVE YOU A FEW TIDBITS FOR THE FAA GRANT SECTION FOR REVENUE, WE DID RECEIVE THE $30,000 UNDER THE CARES ACT FROM THE FAA FOR THAT GRANT. I'VE CLOSED THAT GRANTS OF THE REVENUE IS ALREADY INCLUDED IN THE YEAR TO DATE. FOR THE DESIGN PROJECT OF RUNWAY FOR TWO TO, I HAVE ABOUT 22,000 OF REVENUE AND EXPECT TO COME IN THIS WEEK FOR NEXT WEEK FROM THE FAA. THAT WILL CLOSE OUT THE DESIGN PORTION OF THE GRANT.
WE HAVE EXECUTED THE CONSTRUCTION PORTION OF THAT GRANT AND THAT MONEY IS AVAILABLE TO DRAW WHENEVER WE START THE PROJECT. WE WILL TALK ABOUT THE PROJECT TIMELINE AS YOU MOVE FORWARD. THAT'S KIND OF THE MOST NOTABLE ITEM FROM REVENUE PERSPECTIVE.
OBVIOUSLY YOU CAN SEE FROM AN EXPENSE PERSPECTIVE WE ARE RUNNING POSITIVE THIS POINT IN
THE FISCAL YEAR. >> [INDISCERNIBLE] ENTERED UNDER THE FAA GRANT?
WAS IT FROM THE FAA? >> YES. THE CARES ACT GRANTS THAT CAME IN, THAT FUNDING AS I UNDERSTAND IT IS FROM THE FEDERAL GENERAL FUND SO IT IS DIFFERENT.
IT WAS ADMINISTERED AS AN FAA GRANT. WE BOOKED IT IS FAA GRANT REVENUES. IT WAS AN ACTUAL GRANT THAT WE EXCEPTED FROM THE FA.
>> GOOD. THAT WAS ONE OF MY QUESTIONS. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. WE CAN'T CAN MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEM WHICH IS THE RUNWAY 4/22
[Item 6.2]
PROJECT. AT OUR LAST MEETING WE DISCUSSED THE COMPONENTS OF THE RUNWAY 4/22 PROJECT AND WHAT WE THOUGHT TENTATIVE TIMELINE FOR THAT PROJECT WOULD BE.ALBEIT IN THE EVENING WE DISCUSSED IT, WE LEARNED THAT JACKSONVILLE WOULD BE HOSTING THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION. THE DATES OF THAT ARE 24 TO 27
[00:05:05]
AUGUST. I HAD ALREADY BEEN WORKING AND THE AWARDED CONTRACTOR TO MOVE US SCHEDULED TO START CONSTRUCTION IN EARLY AUGUST, WHICH WOULD HAVE HAD A DECEMBER COMPLETION. THAT'S WHAT WE LOOKED AT ON THE SLIDESHOW.AFTER WE LEARNED ABOUT THE CONVENTION, AND WENT BACK TO THE CONTRACTOR IN A TELECONFERENCE AND SAID I THINK WE NEED TO SLIDE THIS AND AVOID THE CONVENTION.
IT WOULD WILL BE A VERY BUSY TIME AND WE NEED TO HAVE SPACE TO PARK AIRCRAFT.
422 HAS GOOD CAPACITY FOR JET TRAFFIC. THEY ARE PROVIDING THE A NEW TIMELINE. WHAT MOST LIKELY LOOKS LIKE IS TO START THE PROJECT IN SEPTEMBER AND FINISH IN JANUARY. WE WILL BE ABLE TO GO THROUGH THE END OF AUGUST MUST SUPPORT THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION WITH ALL RUNWAYS OPENED WITH FULL CAPABILITY, AND THEN START THE PROJECT AFTER THAT IS DONE TO MOVE FORWARD. I DON'T HAVE THE EXACT TIMELINE.
THEY OWE THAT TO US. I'M TOLD WILL PROBABLY HAVE THAT NEXT WEEK.
THEY NEED TO REARRANGE SOME THINGS BECAUSE WE ARE MOVING ONE DIRECTION AND THEN WE MOVED THE OTHER. I WILL PROBABLY HAVE THAT AND THEY CONTRACT EXECUTED NEXT WEEK SO WE CAN START ON THAT PROJECT. WHEN THEY GET THAT ANSWER I WILL SEND THAT OUT TO THE GROUP SO
YOU KNOW WHAT TO EXPECT FOR THE PROJECT START. >> WITH THE FLY IN IS THAT
AUGUST OR SEPTEMBER? >> THAT IS IN OCTOBER. EARLY OCTOBER.
I BELIEVE BRIAN WILL CAN CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG. I THINK IT IS NINE THROUGH THE
11TH OF OCTOBER. >> EIGHT THROUGH 11. >> EIGHT THROUGH 11.
SORRY. >> NEVERMIND. ARE THOUGHT WE COULD DO
SOMETHING WITH 22 [INDISCERNIBLE] >> NATE?
>> YES, SIR. >> IS KIND OF LIKE A NEW BUSINESS BUT REGARDING THE POTENTIAL POTUS VISIT TO THE ISLAND, HAVE WE EXPERIENCED THIS PREVIOUSLY?
>> I DON'T KNOW IF THEY DO IF IF WHAT YOU'RE ASKING IS IF WE HAD A POTUS VISIT TO THE AIRPORT.
I HAVE HEARD I THINK AT ONE TIME THEY DID. JUST FROM EXPERIENCE STANDPOINT, I WOULD SAY -- I HAVE DEALT WITH THAT ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS AND UNFAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESS OF SUPPORTING A POTUS VISIT. WE ARE WELL EQUIPPED TO DO THAT IF THERE WERE A POTUS VISIT WE
KNOW HOW TO HANDLE THOSE LOGISTICS VERY WELL. >> YEAH.
BE PREPARED TO HAVE EVERYTHING TAKEN OVER. >> YOU BET.
>> CLINTON CAME IN THE 90S ONE TIME. HE DIDN'T FLY IN AN AIRPLANE.
AND HE WENT TO THE RANCH. >> I HEARD THAT POTUS WILL BE GOING TO THE ROOTS.
>> I'M NOT SURE I HAVE THE INFORMATION ON THAT. AT THIS TIME I'M NOT AWARE OF ANY POTUS VISIT TO THE AIRPORT THAT WILL AFFECT US. WE HAVE CERTAINLY -- WE WILL
WORK WITH RYAN AND HIS STAFF FOR THAT. >> IF IT HAPPENS YOU CAN EXPECT A LOT OF MARINE ONE ACTIVITY AND THE ENTOURAGE THAT COMES WITH IT IT'S UNBELIEVABLE.
THEY WILL TAKE OVER A LOT OF TARMAC, ALL OF THE TARMAC. EVERYTHING.
>> WE HAVE WORKED THROUGH THAT PROCESS BEFORE. >> SO YOU HAVE HAD THAT PREVIOUS
EXPERIENCE. >> YES. WE WILL BE JUST FINE.
>> I'M SURE YOU WILL. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON 422? >> SORRY ABOUT THAT INTERRUPTION
>> NO WORRIES. I THINK WE ARE GOOD TO MOVE ON TO THE NEW BUSINESS.
[Item 7.1]
THE FIRST ITEM IS THE VACANCY THAT WAS CREATED WITH THE RESIGNATION OF MR. MCKEE, WHO MOVED OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS. I PUBLISHED THAT THEY CAN SEE ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE AND IT HAS BEEN ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE FOR MOST LIKELY AROUND TWO MONTHS. TO DATE I'VE ONLY RECEIVED ONE SUBMISSION SO I AND PROVIDING THE SUBMISSION I HAVE A PLACE IN YOUR POCKET WHICH IS THE FORM THAT THE INDIVIDUAL FILLED OUT ONLINE. THE APPLICANT IS MR. DOUGLAS GEIB. HE IS A TENANT OF OURS AT THE AIRPORT IN THE RT HANGER AREA.HE HAS PROVIDED A LITTLE BIT OF HIS BACKGROUND INFORMATION. I DID INVITE HIM TO THE MEETING THIS EVENING. UNFORTUNATELY HE FLIES PROFESSIONALLY.
I THINK HE WORKS WITH DAVE PERHAPS SO YOU MIGHT KNOW HIM ON A MORE PERSONAL LEVEL.
UNFORTUNATELY HE WASN'T ABLE TO ZOOM IN WITH US THIS EVENING. I HAVE HIS APPLICATION HERE.
[00:10:02]
HE SAID HE IS REMISS. HE SORRY HE COULDN'T BE HERE BECAUSE HE HAS TO WORK.NONETHELESS IT IS IN FRONT OF VIEW. AS A REMINDER, THE CHARTER FOR THE AAC DICTATES THAT THE AAC WILL MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPOINTMENTS TO THE CITY COMMISSION SO YOU HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THOSE APPLICANTS.
THAT'S WHY THAT IS IN THE PACKET FOR YOU. >> DO YOU NEED THAT NOW?
>> I THINK YOU HAVE TO OPTIONS. ONE IS IF YOU HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION IN THE PACKET TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION, YOU CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH IT. IF YOU DON'T FEEL LIKE YOU DO, I KNOW DOUG WASN'T ABLE TO JOIN US THIS EVENING. WE WERE PLANNING TO HAVE HIM WITH THIS IN SOME CAPACITY. YOU COULD KICK IT TO THE NEXT MEETING.
I DON'T THINK IT IS HURTING US IN ANY WAY. THAT IS AN OPTION AS WELL IF YOU PREFER TO WAIT UNTIL HE CAN JOIN US FOR THE NEXT MEETING AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION.
WHATEVER YOU THINK MIGHT BE APPROPRIATE. >> I HAVE KNOWN CHUCK -- DOUG.
WE WERE IN A NAVY RESERVE UNIT. I THINK HE WOULD BE A GREAT ADDITION.
>> THIS IS DON. I THINK WE NEED HIM. WE NEED A WORKING PROFESSIONAL PILOT TO REPLACE CAN. THINK YOU WOULD BE A GOOD CHOICE.
I'M ALL IN FAVORITE OF IT. >> I WILL JUMP IN THERE AS WELL. I COULDN'T HAVE A HIGHER RECOMMENDATION FOR SOMEBODY THAT WOULD BE A TERRIFIC ASSET. DOUG HAS A MILITARY BACKGROUND.
HE HAS A CORPORATE BACKGROUND. HE HAS A GENERAL AVIATION BACKGROUND AS WELL.
NOT ONLY AS A PILOT BUT HE HAS RECENTLY BEEN IN THE PROCESS OF EVEN BUILDING HIS OWN AIRPLANE.
HE GETS THE FULL SPECTRUM OF WHAT THE AIRPORT IS AND NEEDS. HE ALSO HAS AN UNBELIEVABLE BACKGROUND BEYOND ALL OF THAT. I COULDN'T HAVE A HIGHER RECOMMENDATION FOR DOUG.
>> THIS IS CHUCK AGAIN. HE IS ALSO IN THE FAA AS WELL. >>
>> WILL MAKE A RECOMMENDATION THAT WE AFFORD DOUG APPLICATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION AND WELCOME TO THE AAC. WE WOULD HAVE TO PROVE THAT. WITHOUT ANY OBJECTIONS I DON'T
THINK THERE'S ANY REASON TO DELAY THIS. >> I'M ON BOARD WITH THAT AS
WELL. >> DO WE HAVE A SECOND TO THE MOTION?
>> DAVE BROUGHTON. >> THINK DAVE HAS GIVEN US A SECOND.
>> SECOND THE MOTION. >> LET'S FORWARD THIS TO THE AAY COMMISSION.
>> AYE. >> ANY NE'S NAYS ON THAT? WE WILL MOVE ON.
[Item 7.2]
NEXT ON THE AGENDA, I HAVE I HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH CHRIS COURT OWN.HE IS THE ARCHITECT WHO WAS ASSISTING FROM THE DESIGN OF THE HANGAR PROJECT.
WE HAVE PROVIDED IN THE PACKET AND UPDATED SITE PLAN. CHRIS IS GOING TO GO OVER SOME OF THE INFORMATION OF WHERE WE ARE IN THE PLANNING PROCESS. I THINK AS CHRIS AND THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT IT TODAY, THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION AND THAT WOULD LIKE TO ASK FOR SOME INPUT FROM THE AAC ON A FEW OF THE DESIGN COMPONENTS WHICH WILL GET TO.
I WILL HANDED OVER TO CHRIS FIRST TO TELL US WHERE WE ARE ASKED ASK AND WHAT'S CURRENTLY
ON THE SITE PLAN WHICH IS IN YOUR PACKET FOR YOU. >> RIGHT NOW IT'S A WORK IN PROGRESS. PRELIMINARY DRAFT. THE BIGGEST HURDLES WE ARE WORKING ON RIGHT NOW IS THE DRAINAGE AND MAKING SURE IT WORKS WITH OUR DRAINAGE PLAN.
THE WAY THAT WORKS IS THERE'S ALSO A VERY SHALLOW FLAT. UNFORTUNATELY THE WATER TABLE IS HIGHER THAN WE WANTED TO BE. UNFORTUNATELY WE ARE PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE TO PROVIDE UNDERDRAIN'S IN ORDER TO GET THE WATER TO GET AWAY FROM THE SITE. WE KNOW IN THE PAST BACK IN I THINK HE WAS 2014 WE ADDED TRENCH DRAINS AND SO FORTH DOWN THE CENTER OF THESE TWO HANGERS, WHICH WAS THE CENTER OF HANGER SIX WHERE WE PUT SOME TRENCH DRAINS.
WE WERE HOPING WE COULD USE SOME OF THOSE BUT UNFORTUNATELY IN THE LOCATION WHEN THEY GET CLOSE TO US THERE SHALLOW. WE ARE NOW LOOKING AT BRINGING THE WATER BACK AROUND INTO THE MAIN STORM DRAIN RUNNING DOWN THE TAXIWAY RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE OLD FBO.
WE'RE WORKING THAT OUT. WE ARE ALSO DOING THE BEST WE CAN TO RAISE THE FLOORS HIGHER
[00:15:02]
THAN THE EXISTING FLOORS OF THE ADJACENT BUILDINGS. THE ADJACENT BUILDINGS ARE 12.9.I THINK WE ARE ABLE TO AT LEAST GET THEM TO 13 FEET MAYBE A LITTLE BIT MORE.
131-INCH, MAYBE 132 INCHES. IT'S TOUGH. TRYING TO GET THAT WATER AWAY WORK WE ARE LOOKING AT THAT AND TRYING TO RAISE THAT IS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
THE BOX HANGER, THE THREE BOX HANGER BUILDING, WORKS VERY WELL WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO IS WE ARE ALSO LOOKING AT THE ELECTRICAL. WE WILL BE NEEDING SOME ELECTRICAL UPGRADE OF THE OLD BUILDING AS WE DISCOVERED. THE DISCONNECT DOESN'T FUNCTION ANYMORE IT'S KIND OF RUSTED SHUT OVER THE YEARS. THESE BUILDINGS EYE BELIEVER BUILT IN THE 60S OR EVEN SOONER. THEY WERE LIKE THE FIRST ON THIS AIRPORT. WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO IS WE DISCOVERED THAT THE POWER IS ALL RUN FROM THE HANGER SIX. THE METER AND THE DISCONNECT AND THEN THE PANELS FEEDS TO HAGER SEVEN AND HANGER FIVE. WHAT WE ARE PLANNING ON DOING IS WE DISCOVERED THAT THE GAUGE THAT WE RAN UP THE POLE IS ALSO ON THE GUARDS TRAILER WHICH IS OVER THERE.
WE ARE GOING TO REMOVE THAT POLE BECAUSE IT WILL BE IN THE WAY OF THE DOOR OPENING OF THE BOX HANGER. IT IS IN OUR AREA OF THE BUILDING.
OUR PLAN IS TO RUN A NEW POWER POLE JUST BEHIND THE FBO IN THE CORNER OF THE PARKING LOT.
THAT WILLPOWER TEA HANGER SEVEN, PLUS THE OLD T-HANGAR. PLUS IT WILL RUN THE GATE.
WHAT THAT DOES IS IT FREES UP THE POWER THAT IS CURRENTLY AND WE CAN USE AND REGAIN AMPERAGE TO THEN SUPPORT THE ADDITION OF HANGER 6. WHAT WILL HAPPEN IS HANGER 6 WILL RUN THE NEW EDITION AND KEEP RUNNING TEA HANGER STEP FIVE.
WE WILL BE ABLE TO UTILIZE THAT. WHAT WE ARE ALSO GOING TO DO IS WE WILL RELOCATE THE TOILET ROOM TO THE RIGHT-HAND SIDE OF THE STORAGE ROOM. WHAT THAT DOES IS A AGAINST THE PIPING CLOSER TO WHERE WE ARE GOING TO TIE IN. THERE IS A 4-INCH SANITARY LINE NEAR THE OLD FBO LINE. NOT TO THE GRIND UP HUB BUT TO THE SEPTIC AND THEN FROM THERE IT GOES TO THE GRINDER AND GETS FORCE MAIN INTO THE SEWER. WE ARE HOPE HER TO DO TO AVOID THE GRINDER PUMP. WE ARE GOING TO -- BY MOVING THE BATHROOM OVER, WE ARE GOING TO ASK FOR A VARIANCE. I HAVEN'T DISCUSSED DISCUSSED THIS YET WITH THE FIRE MARSHALL, BUT REQUEST OF A VARIANCE WILL BE IF THEY WILL ALLOW US TO NOT HAVE TO PUT IT TO OUR WALL IN THE SECTION OF THE T-HANGAR THAT IS LESS THAN 50 FEET AWAY. AND FPA 409 GOT RID OF THAT.
THE OLD CODE HAD CLUSTERS WHICH HELD BUT WITH CLUSTERS GONE WE ARE NOW HELD TO 50 FEET, AS FAR AS THE MAX CLEARANCE BEFORE YOU HAVE TO DO FIREWALLS WHICH IS 5. AS FAR AS BUILDING CODE, THE STORAGE BUILDINGS, THEY ALLOW US 30 FEET BEFORE THEY START REQUIRING ANY TYPE OF FIRE RATING. ALSO, THE EXISTING HANGER THAT WE ARE NEARBY HAS TOTALLY BLOCKED WALLS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE HANGER WHICH ARE VERY FIRE RESISTANT AND ARE VERY CLOSE TO A RADIUS. I'M HOPING I CAN JUSTIFY AND EXPLAIN IT AND HOPEFULLY THEY WILL SEE IT OUR WAY AND THAT WILL HELP SAVE SOME MONEY. PART OF MOVING THE BATHROOM ALSO IS WE DON'T WANT -- TO EXPENSES. [INDISCERNIBLE] WE WILL SEE IF THAT WORKS.
AS FAR AS WORKING ON BUDGET, SOME OF THE THINGS WE DIDN'T ANTICIPATE BUT ARE LOOKING TO MAKE SURE WE ARE ON IS WE ARE HOPING NOT TO DO DRAINAGE. THE DRAINAGE HAS BECOME QUITE COMPLICATED WITH OVER 250, 350 RUNS TO GET TO THE NEAREST OUT PULL.
YOU CAN'T USE THE OUT PULL BY THE AIRPORT RODE. IT DOESN'T WORK WITH THE DRAINAGE PLAN. YOU HAVE TO GO TO THE PIPE THAT IS RUNNING DOWN THE TAXIWAY.
[00:20:02]
ALSO, THE ELECTRICAL ISSUES. WE WANT TO BE SURE THAT WE DON'T HAVE MUCH OF A PROBLEM WHAT WE HAVE TO BUY A NEW DISCONNECT FOR THE OTHER BUILDINGS WE DIDN'T ANTICIPATE BECAUSE IT'S NOT IN GOOD SHAPE IF WE HAVE A CALL MAINTENANCE TO GET THEM TO LOOSEN IT UP WORK OTHERWISE WE ARE DOING WELL. THE INDESIGN WE ARE SHOWING RIGHT NOW FOR THE T-HANGAR WOULD BE HYDRAULIC OUT SWING DOOR IN LIEU OF SLIDING DOORS. THE REASON WE ARE TRYING TO NOT DO SLIDING DOORS IS THAT THE OLDER HANGERS ARE VERY THIN AND WERE HELD BY THE THINNESS OF THOSE HANGERS BECAUSE THE TAXILANES ARE NOT EVEN COMPLYING WITH CURRENT CLEARANCES AT 79 FEET. I THINK YOU HAVE MAYBE 75 FEET BETWEEN THE HANGERS.WE CAN'T GO ANY MORE OUTBOARD WITH THE EXISTING HANGERS. WE ARE HELD TO ABOUT 34 FEET.
WE SEE THAT ON THE SURVEY IT SAYS 33 BUT WE DON'T THINK THEY ARE COUNTING THE ADDITIONAL 6 INCHES OF THE DOORS. SO RIGHT NOW WE ARE JUST ASSUMING 34 BUT ONCE WE HIT THE BUILD AND THE FIELD MANAGER WE MIGHT GET A LITTLE SMALLER. WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO DO IS IF WE GO WITH SLIDING DOORS WE WOULD HAVE TO DO DOUBLE TRACKS THE WAY THE LAYOUT IS.
WITH THE WING LOADING IS NOW YOU WOULD HAVE -- THEY ALL ALTER THE SLIDING DOORS NOW THE SAME THICKNESS AS THE WALLS. YOU WOULD BASICALLY LOSE A FOOT MORE ON EACH SIDE AND THEN YOU GET VERY NARROW. THAT'S WHY WE ARE PROCEEDING WITH THE OUT SWING DOORS SO WE DON'T LOSE ALL THAT ROOM FOR THE TRACK YOU NEED FOR THE SLIDING DOORS.
WE ARE APPROACHING IT IN THAT REGARD. WE WERE THINKING THAT QUITE POSSIBLY IF BUDGET IS A CONCERN, THAT WE MAY DO AN ALTERNATE LAYOUT WHICH WOULD BE A HANGER THAT WOULD PRETTY MUCH COPY THE TEA HANGER WITH THE SLIDING DOORS AND AS AN ALTERNATE IN CASE BECAUSE THE ELECTRICAL AND SITE WORK MIGHT GET BEYOND WHAT WE HAVE IN FUNDING.
WE MAY PROVIDE THAT AS AN ALTERNATE IN ORDER TO GET SIX UNITS BUILT.
WHAT THAT ALTERNATE WOULD BE A RECONSTRUCTION OF THE EXISTING T-HANGAR, SAME HEIGHT, 12-FOOT SLIDING DOORS. BUT WE WOULD LOSE ANOTHER 2 FEET IN EACH ONE OF THOSE UNITS
INSTEAD OF HAVING THE OUT SWING. >> CHRIS, MAYBE I COULD ADD SOME DETAILS.
JUSTIFY BACK UP A STEP. ON THE PICTURE WHAT WE ARE SEEING
[00:28:47]
>> WHEN WE SAY 14-FOOT MINIMUM CLEAR THE DOOR WILL BE 54. >> HAVE EXPERIENCE WITH THESE DOORS AND WE HAVE HAD ZERO PROBLEMS WITH THEM. WE HAVE HAD THEM FOR ABOUT TEN
YEARS. IT'S BEEN A GOOD EXPERIENCE. >> THESE ARE FROM HIGHER POWER.
THEY ARE NOT THE OLD HYDRO SWING THAT WENT BELLY UP WITH THE FAILURES AND CRASHING DOWN ON
PLANES AND VEHICLES. >> AND PEOPLE. >> WE WOULD RECOMMEND THAT.
>> WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT AND TRYING TO CHANGE THE FOUNDATION OF THESE HANGERS.
IS THIS IN ANY WAY GOING TO IMPACT -- ARE THEY GOING TO BE HIGHER OFF THE GROUND OR HIGHER THAN THE T-HANGAR'S THAT WE HAVE ALIGNED IN THERE? WILL THEY BE THE SAME HEIGHT?
>> THEY WILL BE SLIGHTLY HIGHER. THEY WILL BE AS HIGH AS WE CAN MAKE THEM AND BRING DOWN ONLY ABOUT 13.1. IT'S NOT A LOT HIGHER. ONLY THREE OR 4 INCHES
DIFFERENT. >> OKAY. >> WE JUST THINK THAT IN THAT
[00:30:01]
AREA BECAUSE THE OTHER AREAS THAT WOULD -- TO GET THOSE HANGERS HIGHER AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. WE ARE ALSO TREATING THEM AS FAR AS CODE, WE ARE PULLING THEM OUT OF THE -- CALLING THEM ADDITIONS. WE ARE NOT HILL TO UPGRADING THE ENTIRE HANGER. THE EDITION WILL BE UP TO CURRENT CODE, EVERYTHING CURRENT CODE, BUT IT WON'T MAKE US GO BACK TO UPGRADE THE ENTIRE HANGER SEVEN TO GET UP TO CODE THE INTENT REALLY DOWN THE ROAD IS THESE EVENTUALLY REMOVING THESE HANGERS AND CONSTRUCT NEW ONES OR FULLY RENOVATING THEM OUT. DOWN THE ROAD AS TIME PERMITS.'S BACK TIME AND. THANK YOU. >> ALSO, AS FAR AS THE DOORS COME, THE RULE OF THUMB IS, ON THE END UNITS YOU LOSE ABOUT A FOOT.
MAYBE A LITTLE BIT ON THE DOOR. THAT'S WHY THE ONE UNIT IS 52 FEET SO WE GET FAIRLY CLOSE, PROBABLY 849-FOOT DOOR. THE ONE IN THE MIDDLE YOU LOSE ABOUT A FOOT OR A FOOT AND A HALF. USUALLY ONLY A FOOT. RESORT IN THE MIDDLE WILL BE ABOUT 43 AND THE OTHER TWO WILL BE -- YOU WILL HAVE A 41, 43 [INDISCERNIBLE]
>> CHRIS, BY DESIGN OF THIS TAXIWAY YOU ARE LIMITED TO A WINGSPAN?
>> REALLY CAN'T GET ANYTHING LARGER GOING DOWN. >> THE T-HANGAR'S, THIS FIVE AND A HLF FEET, IS A CONCRETE WALKWAY BETWEEN T-HANGAR 6 AND -- IS THIS FOR THE
BATHROOM FACILITIES? >> THERE ARE TWO REASONS FOR THAT.
ONE REASON IS JUST TO MAKE IT CONVENIENT FOR PEOPLE TO GET FROM THE OTHER HANGERS TO THE BATHROOM. WE WILL HAVE SWALES ON THE OTHER SIDE SO WE REALLY CAN'T WALK AROUND THE OUTSIDE. ALSO, RIGHT THERE, YOU DON'T SEE IT BUT IS YOUR DISCONNECT, YOUR METERS AND YOUR PANELS. IF WE DON'T TREAT THAT LIKE A BREEZEWAY THEN IT -- YOU DON'T WANT TO TRIP. THE BREEZEWAY MAKES IT OKAY TO KEEP THOSE PANELS WHERE THEY ARE AND YOU DON'T HAVE TO RELOCATE AND THERE IS PROPER PULLBACK AS FAR AS CODE SO NO ONE WILL BE
ACCIDENTALLY ELECTROCUTED. >> OKAY. JUST MAKING SURE AND ONLY ONE
TREE WOULD BE REMOVED? ONE OAK TREE? >> JUST ONE OAK TREE.
I THINK DAVE WAS TAKING A LOOK AND HE SAID IT WAS LOOKING LIKE HE WAS NEAR DEATH.
>> THINK IT IS DEAD. >> OKAY. >> IT IS A 20-INCH OAK TREE THAT ISN'T IS LIKE THE OAKS YOU SEE. AND LOOKS LIKE A THICKET. NOT A HUGE OUTCROPPING OF
BRANCHES. >> THOUGHT IT WAS GOING TO FALL ON A TRAILER ANY DAY.
[LAUGHTER] >> ALSO PROVIDING COME OF THIS IS WHAT WE DO AT ALL AIRPORTS, IS WE PROVIDE A 2-FOOT GRAVEL APRON ALL AROUND THE BUILDING. IT KEEPS WE WHACKERS AWAY.
IT KEEPS THE METAL DRIVE -- DRY SO YOU DON'T GET ALL OF THE RUST FROM THE CORROSION AT THE BASE OF THESE HANGERS. SOMEBODY SIDESWIPED IT. IT KEEPS THEM AWAY.
ALSO WHAT WE HAVE IN THE BACK OF THE HANGERS IS A SIX-INCH SHUT DOWN SO THERE IS NO WATER THAT
CAN MAKE ITS WAY THERE. >> SOUNDS GOOD. >> LOOKS PRETTY NICE.
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? FROM THE GROUP, ANY OF THE
QUESTIONS? >> I HAD -- ONE TIME WE TALKED ABOUT POSSIBLY MOVING THE ROADWAY NEAR GATE THREE. IT LOOKS LIKE THAT'S UNNECESSARY.
>> IT WOULD BE VERY PROBLEMATIC AND COSTLY. >> THAT'S WHAT LED TO THE ANGER
CONCEPT. >> IT'S NOT NECESSARY. THE WAY WE SET UP A HANGER
[00:35:05]
AT THE OTHER SIDE OF THAT ROAD WHICH WOULD MAKE THE DRAIN. >> WOULD THERE BE PARKING ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF THOSE? >> WE HAVE A BID ADDITIVE. I COULD SHARE MY SCREEN.
WE COULD EXPLAIN IT. LIKE AT THE END OF AIRPORT RODE YOU HAVE THAT CUL-DE-SAC AT THE END OF THE HANGER BEFORE THE DRY POND. WHEN WE DO THE DIMENSIONING YOU HAVE ABOUT 10 FEET OF EXTRA ASPHALT AFTER YOUR 79 FEET OF YOUR REQUIRED CLEARANCE FOR YOUR APPROACH OF AIRCRAFT. WE ARE PUTTING SEVEN PARALLEL PARKING SPACES THAT RUN RIGHT THERE WHERE AIRPORT RODE STARTS TO TURN AND GO BETWEEN THE TWO HANGERS, THERE IS ENOUGH TO PUT DOWN THAT STRIP, JUST STRIPING AND TWO SIGNS AND ANOTHER LINE THAT SHOWS THE AREA AND PASSED
THAT IS A NINE BY 25 SPACES AND YOU GET SEVEN OF THEM. >> FROM OUR STANDARDS YOU ARE REQUIRED TO DO 50 PERCENT OF YOUR UNITS AS PARKING SPACES. IF WE ARE FOLLOWING OUR OWN STANDARDS WE SHOULD BE PRODUCING THREE SPOTS WHEN WE CREATE THE SIX HANGERS.
AS CHRIS MENTIONED COME I DID AND PUT THAT IN THE PACKET WE HAVE A SPACE WHERE WE COULD CREATE SOME OF THAT PARKING. WHILE WE ARE DOING IT CREATE FUTURE PARKING FOR ADDITIONAL USE. AGAIN, BY RULES AND RAGS, IF YOU ARE USING YOUR UNIT YOU ARE
STILL ALLOWED TO PARK YOUR CAR IN THE HANGER. >> IS MORE LIKE OVERFLOW -- MORE
OVERFLOW PARKING. >> NATE, I CAN SEND YOU, I WILL SEND YOU AN UPDATED DRAWING.
>> FABULOUS. ANY OF THE QUESTIONS? OKAY.
IF NO OTHER QUESTIONS I WILL MOVE ON. IF YOU DO HAVE QUESTIONS IN THE COMING DAYS JUST LET ME KNOW. CHRIS AND I ARE WORKING ON THIS AND I WILL TRY TO KEEP YOU UP TO DATE IF WE ARE MAKING AMENDMENTS OR HITTING ROADBLOCKS. I'M OPENED TO FEEDBACK.
>> ALSO WILL BE COULD DO IS WHEN WE HAVE THE PACKAGE READY FOR TRC WE COULD ALWAYS SEND YOU THE
PACKAGE. >> ABSOLUTELY. I WILL WANT EVERYONE TO KNOW WHAT THE FINAL PLAN IS AND IF WE MADE ANY CHANGES THAT WERE CAUSED BY SOMETHING ALONG THE
WAY TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE SOME INPUT. >> WHAT WE ARE GOING TO BE DOING IS BECAUSE OF THE UNDER DRAINING AND THE PIPING HAVE TO DO, WE HAVE TO RUN THE PIPES TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE HANGER, THE OLD LEFT FIELD HANGER, WE ARE PROBABLY GOING TO TAKE OUT A LOT
OF EXTRA CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND CLEAR ALL OF THAT OUT. >> THAT WOULD BE NICE.
>> WE HAVE TO PUT THE PIPING FOR THE BATHROOM AND THE DRAINAGE WE MIGHT AS WELL CLEAR THAT AND GRADE GRADED OUT BETTER SO WORKS ALL AROUND CLEANER. IT WILL BE NICE.
I WILL SEND IT OUT ONCE WE HAVE IT ALL WORKED OUT. WE ARE ILLUMINATING THE SHED.
THERE IS NO PURPOSE [INDISCERNIBLE] NOW THAT WE ARE ADDING MORE STORAGE IN THE HANGER. THAT WILL BE THE WAY OF THE APPROACH OF THE AIRCRAFT.
>> WE CAN MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEM. THE ANNUAL CONCOURSE SAFETY
[Item 7.3]
PLAN. WE SUBMIT THIS EVERY YEAR. I HAVE NO INDICATION OF ANYTHING CHANGING YET OR WHAT WILL HAPPEN FOR MARCH. HOWEVER, I'M NORMALLY SUBMIT THIS PLAN TO THE FAA IN AUGUST SO I AM I'M PROPOSING THE SAME PLAN WE USED LAST YEAR WITH THE ANTICIPATION THAT WE WILL SEE CONCOURSE, RUSSO AND STEELE, ALL OF THE AIRPORT IN MARCH.THE CONCEPTS AND THE COMPONENTS OF THE PLANNER JUST LIKE WE SAW LAST YEAR AS WE SUBMITTED AND AS THE FAA APPROVED. NO CHANGES TO THE WAY WE OPERATE IT.
THIS SAME PLAN WAS USED WHEN WE DID HAVE RUSSO AND STEELE BUT SUCCESSFULLY THIS LAYOUT WORKED WITH RUSSO AND STEELE THE AGENCY AT THE END OF THE RUNWAY. WHEN IT WAS CONDUCTED IN THE FIRST YEAR. WE WERE SUCCESSFUL WITH THE WAY THIS WAS LAID OUT.
I DONATE -- DON'T ANTICIPATE ANY ISSUES WITH THE FAA. I KNOW WE ARE WELL IN ADVANCE OF THAT BUT EXPECTS -- IS BEST TO GET INTO THE FAA AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
I JUST WANTED TO TAKE A LOOK AT IT AND GIVE ANY COMMENTS THAT YOU HAVE.
IT IS THE SAME AS WHAT WE HAVE USED BEFORE. >> THINK IT IS A GOOD PLAN, NATE
[00:40:01]
, TO STAY AHEAD OF IT AND PLAN ON EVERYTHING OCCURRING. IF SOMETHING DOES CHANGE THAT ISALL WE HAD TO DEAL WITH. >> RIGHT. AND IF THERE IS A CANCELLATION OR SOMETHING CHANGES FOR THE EVENT, IT IS EASIER TO DO AN AMENDMENT AND/OR IF SOMETHING IS NOT HAPPENING ONCE YOU HAVE THE APPROVAL IT IS JUST A NOTIFICATION TO THE FAA IS TO SAY THE EVENT IS HAPPENING. BETTER TO HAVE IT IN HAND AND BE READY FOR.
>> YES. FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, I THINK EVERYTHING -- THIS PLAN IS GOOD AND IT WAS WELL EXECUTED NOT ONLY LAST YEAR BUT MANY YEARS IN THE PAST.
WE SHOULD JUST STICK WITH THE SAME PLAN. >> FABULOUS.
>> AGREE. >> I AGREE AS WELL. >> IF THERE THERE'S NO CONCERNS FOR IT WHAT WE WOULD DO NEXT IS I WILL TAKE THIS PLAN AND GET IT SENT OUT TO THE FAA IN THE NEXT FEW WEEKS AND LET THEM START PROCESSING AND I'LL KEEP YOU IN THE LOOP.
AS SOON AS I HEAR ANYTHING AS WE ARE MOVING FORWARD FROM ANY OF THE AGENCIES, I WILL MAKE SURE
THAT YOU KNOW AS WELL. >> THANK YOU. >> OF COURSE.
THE LAST ONE WAS A LAST MINUTE ADDED TO THE AGENDA. THIS IS A FACILITY USE AGREEMENT
[Item 7.4]
FOR USE OF PROPERTY IN EARLY AUGUST. IT IS WELL THE CONFLICTED FROM THE CONVENTION COMING UP. IF YOU REMEMBER WE HAD A FACILITIES AGREEMENT JUST LIKE THIS FOR AN ARMY GUARD UNIT -- AND AIR NATIONAL GUARD UNIT THAT WAS GOING TO USE OUR PROPERTY THIS SUMMER AS PART OF AN EXERCISE OUT OF A CLOSE RUNWAY. THEY ENDED UP CANCELING FOR MULTIPLE REASONS. THINK THAT -- WHEN THEY CANCELED THIS OTHER UNIT THAT WAS WORKING WITH THEM WAS AWARE OF THE ARRANGEMENT AND ASKED TO DO THE SAME THING.THEY ARE ASKING TO BE NEXT TO THE CLOSED RUNWAY FOR A PERIOD OF CALL IT -- TIME IN EARLY AUGUST. I DON'T ANTICIPATE ANY IMPACTS FROM THEM.
THERE IS NO EQUIPMENT OR ANYTHING. AIRPORT OPERATIONS SO THE FACILITY USE AGREEMENT LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE THE ONE I'VE USED BEFORE WITH THE NATIONAL GUARD UNIT. THIS IS A THE COMMUNICATION SQUADRON ASKING TO USE AIRPORT PROPERTY FOR THEIR FIELD EXERCISE. THAT'S WHAT THIS IS.
>> THIS IS DON. WHAT WOULD TO THEY ACTUALLY DO? I CAN'T REMEMBER.
THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO AVIATION BUT WHAT DO THEY ACTUALLY DO? >> THIS GROUP IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT THAN THE AIR NATIONAL GUARD UNIT. THE AIR NATIONAL GUARD UNIT THAT WAS WORKING WITH US BEFORE WAS A TACTICAL CONTROL UNITS SO THEY WERE SETTING UP THEIR EQUIPMENT AND EXERCISING TACTICAL CONTROL. WHICH IS COMBAT CONTROL OF AIRCRAFT AIR SPACE.
THIS IS A COMMUNICATION SQUADRON. WHAT THEY WANT TO DO IS THEY PRACTICED COMING OUT WITH VOCAL COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT AND SETTING UP THEIR EQUIPMENT IN AN AN AIR BASE ENVIRONMENTS MOST OF THE EXERCISE IS THEIR ABILITY TO BE EXPEDITIONARY, SET UP THEIR EQUIPMENT IN A LOCATION AND OPERATE IN A BEAR BASE ENVIRONMENTS IN A LOCATION.
THEY DON'T HAVE ANY EQUIPMENT THAT IS LIKE RADIO FREQUENCIES OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT THAT THEY WILL OPERATE. IT WON'T CONFLICT WITH AIRPORT OPERATIONS.
FOR THEM IT IS THE PRACTICE OF SETTING UP AND GETTING THE EQUIPMENT TURNED ON TO SHOW THAT THEY CAN GET TO EXPEDITIONARY. THAT'S WHAT FOLKS DO WHEN THEY DO THESE.
>> THANK YOU. >> DON'T SEE ANY REASON WHY WE WOULDN'T WANT TO HELP THESE
FOLKS. I THINK THIS IS FINE. >> DO WE NEED A NOTION, NATE?
>> I WILL TAKE A MOTION IF THEY GET ONE. >> THERE ARE NO CLOSED RUNWAY'S RUNWAYS ON THIS, RIGHT? MY MOVE THAT THIS FACILITY USE AGREEMENT GETS ACCEPTED AS
PROPOSED. >> I'VE SECOND. >> SECOND.
[Item 8.1]
THE LAST ITEM I HAVE IS SIMPLY MY MONTHLY REPORT. I HAVE -- ONE OF THE ITEMS I'VE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT A LITTLE BIT IS THE CONVENTION COMING UP IN AUGUST AND OBVIOUSLY BRIAN AND I ARE TALKING THAT. WE HAVE ENGAGED WITH SOME FOLKS AND REPRESENTATIVES OF THE EVENTS SO WE ARE WORKING TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT EVENT WILL BE SUCCESSFUL.I HAVE ALSO HAD A DISCUSSION WITH THE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD. THEY ARE WAITING FOR FINAL APPROVAL,, BUT TENTATIVELY IT SOUNDS LIKE WE MAY SEE TEMPORARY POWER FROM THE SAME FOLKS THAT PROVIDE OUR CONCOURSE DURING THE TIME FRAME TO HELP SUPPORT THE INFLUX OF TRAFFIC WE MAY SEE.
THE FAA IS AWARE OF THAT. THEY WERE ENCOURAGING THAT DISCUSSION AS WELL AND THEY ARE VERY HAPPY TO HEAR THAT. I'M WAITING TO HEAR BACK FINAL WORD ON THE AIR NATIONAL GUARD
[00:45:01]
FOR THAT EVENT COMING UP IN AUGUST. WE WILL BE WORKING OBVIOUSLY CLOSELY ON THAT AS THEY COME WE COME INTO THE MONTH OF AUGUST. IF THAT EVENT MOVES FORWARD IT WILL TAKE SOME TIME OUT OF OUR SCHEDULE TO PLAN. I THINK THAT'S ALL I HAVE IN THEREPORT. ANY QUESTIONS? >> HAVE ONE.
THIS IS DON. THE SOUTH SHORE THE ROW FINGERS [INDISCERNIBLE] THE HOME ROW
HANGERS. WHERE THEY ARE THEY GOING? >> THOSE THREE HANGERS ARE WEST OF THE LAST ROW ANGER SECTION JUST CATTY CORNER FROM HANGER B ON THE NORTH SIDE.
WE MET WITH ABOUT TWO WEEKS AGO DURING COVID, OBVIOUSLY, THEY INSTALLED TO START CONSTRUCTION.
THEY WERE JUST IN HERE AND THEY MET WITH A FEW INDIVIDUALS WHO MIGHT WANT TO ENTER LEASE AGREEMENTS WITH THEM WHILE THEY WERE HERE. THE UPDATE HE GAVE US AT THAT TIME WAS THAT THEY WERE GETTING FINAL NUMBERS FROM HARRISON CONTACTORS AND THEY WOULD PROBABLY BE SUBMITTING FOR A BUILDING PERMIT WITHIN THE NEXT COMING WEEKS TO START CONSTRUCTION. WE DID ALREADY FILE A 7462 THE FAA AND THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED.
THE FAA COORDINATION IS DONE. THEY JUST NEED TO GET THERE BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTED TO
START CONSTRUCTION. >> NOW I REMEMBER. THAT LEADS TO ANOTHER QUESTION.
WITH THE CITY BE IN COMPETITION WITH THEM FOR THE HANGERS AS FAR AS?
>> THINK WE COULD BE. IF THE DEMAND WERE SUCH THAT THERE WASN'T -- THAT WE DIDN'T HAVE STRONG DEMAND, I COULD SEE US IN COMPETITION. THE RATE STRUCTURE CERTAINLY IS GOING TO BE DIFFERENT THAN THE CITIES. HANGERS ARE NOT CHEAP TO BUILD SO THEY HAVE TO COMPENSATE FOR THE COST. WE HAVE 68 INDIVIDUALS ON THE WAITING LIST. AT THE CURRENT TIME, I THINK WE HAVE SUCH STRONG DEMAND AND SUCH A WAY TO TO GET INTO HANGER SPACE, I KNOW FOLKS HAVE BEEN EAGER TO TALK TO THEM BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE TO COMPLY WITH OUR WAITING LIST TO GET A HANGER AND MAYBE A LITTLE BIT MORE -- WHEREAS IF YOU ARE YOU'RE IN THE CITY'S WAITING LIST FOR 68, WE ARE BUILDING SIX UNITS THIS FALL, OBVIOUSLY THAT DOESN'T GET TO DO ZERO FROM 68. I THINK A CITY WOULD ABSOLUTELY BE IN SOME COMPETITION. WE HAVE GOOD DEMAND OF THE AT THE SAME TIME.
I THINK THEY WILL BE ABLE TO FILL THEIR HANGERS. >> VERY GOOD.
THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THE REPORT?
[Item 9]
HOW ABOUT COMMISSION MEMBER REPORTS OR COMMENTS FROM THE GROUP?>> YOU HAVE THE SITE PLANS OF ELEMENT FOR THE DRYER HOUSE THAT WAS PART OF OUR PACKAGE.
>> I'M GLAD YOU REMINDED ME. CHRIS PROVIDED AN UPDATED SITE PLAN.
BY ALMOST FORGOT TO MENTION THAT JUST TO TAKE A SECOND. THEY BEEN WORKING ON THE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN OF THE SITE PLAN. THEY SIMPLY PROVIDED A MORE UP TO DATE IMAGE AND CHRIS, DO YOU HAVE ANY MORE RECENT UPDATES ON YOUR WORK WITH THE CITY FOR
DESIGNING THAT SITE AND LAYOUT THAT YOU WANT TO ADD? >> YEAH.
IS NOT SHOWN THERE RIGHT NOW, IS THE ADDITIONAL ASPHALT WE ARE ADDING TO THE ACCESS DRIVE.
RIGHT NOW YOU CAN SEE IT IS SHADED WITH THE LIGHT DOTTED LINES.
WE WILL BE ADDING THAT ADDITIONAL ASPHALT. SO THAT THE VEHICLE CAN GET ONTO THE APRON. WE ARE ALSO GOING TO PROVIDE SOME KIND OF WARNING FLASHING DEVICE SO WHEN THAT GATE IS OPENED AND ACTIVATED COME OF THE VEHICLE WILL START HEADING TO THE ENTRANCE, WE WILL HAVE SOME FORM OF FLASHING WARNING DEVICE SO THAT THE VEHICLE CAN ENTER
ONTO THE APRON AND TURN LEFT. >> WHAT CHRIS IS MENTIONING, WE DISCUSSED THE INTERACTION WITH THE HANGER. ONE OF THE ITEMS WE DISCUSSED WAS WANTING TO MAKE SURE THAT IF AN AIRCRAFT IS APT -- TAXIING NEAR THE APRON THERE IS A VISUAL CUE IF THAT GATE IS OPENED AND A FIRE TRUCK MAYBE COMING THROUGH, OTHER THAN JUST THE FIRE TRUCK. THEY HAVE LIGHTS AS THAT GATE IS TRIGGERED ON THE OUTSIDE IN THE TRUCK IS HEADING TO THE GATE THERE'S A FLASHING WARNING LIGHT. SO IF YOU ARE TAXIING IN AND YOU SEE THAT FLASHING LIGHT IS AN INDICATION THAT THERE IS AN VEHICLE GETTING READY TO COME OUT ON THE APRON THERE.
AT THAT ACCESS POINT WE WON'T WANT AS A PART OF OUR DESIGN WANT TO CONSIDER THAT TO PARK AIRPLANES IN FRONT OF THAT DAY. ONE THING THAT'S COMING UP AT THE AIRPORT IS NEXT SPRING WE
[00:50:01]
WILL BE DESIGNING THE REHABILITATION OF THE TRANSIT PARKING APRON ON THE WEST SIDE.THE FBO SIDE. THAT ASPHALT IS REACHING THE END OF HIS LIFE.
AT THE SAME TIME I RECOMMEND THAT WE COULD POTENTIALLY DESIGNING THE PINK MARKING SCHEME FOR THE ENTIRE APRON. THAT LEADS TO THIS AS WELL. AS THE FIRE STATION IS GETTING BUILT WE WANTED PINK MARKING SCHEME THAT MAKES SENSE AND ALSO TO PUT THE GATE WERE EMERGENCY VEHICLES ARE COMING IN STRIKE IT APPROPRIATELY SO WE ARE CREATING SOME CONFLICT FOR THE TAXIING
AIRPLANES OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. IF THAT MAKES SENSE. >> WHEN WE ARE DONE WITH THIS PROJECT AND THE FIREHOUSE IS IN-SERVICE, WHAT WHAT WILL THAT DO TO THE STATUS OF OUR AIRPORT AS IT RELATES TO THE RFS AND ALSO THE STANDARDS AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
THE 139. WILL IT CHANGE OUR STATUS AS AN AIRPORT?
>> WE HAVE A DISCUSSION TO HAVE THERE. WE HAVE NO FEDERAL REQUIREMENT TO HAVE AN RF CAPABILITY PUBLISHED FOR THE AIRPORT. ON THE COMMERCIAL SIDE FOR PART 139, OUR STATUS REQUIREMENT FOR COVERAGE IS NORMALLY DICTATED OFF OF YOUR SCHEDULE OF FLIGHT ACTIVITY. YOUR RF CAPABILITY HAS TO BE PRESENT AND AVAILABLE SO MANY MINUTES BEFORE YOUR FIRST FLIGHT OF THE DAY AND SO MANY MINUTES AFTER YOUR LAST FLIGHT OF THE DAY. WE HAVE A DISCUSSION AND WE HAVE A DESIRE TO CARRY AN RF CAPABILITY, IT WILL HAVE AN IMPACT TO THE CITY. BY IMPACT ON ME AN EXPENSE BECAUSE THEY WILL HAVE TO HAVE SO MANY RF TRAINED INDIVIDUALS ON SITE TO PROVIDE THAT SERVICE.
IF WE DESIRE TO SIMPLY HAVE AN RF VEHICLE IN THE BAY AND OBVIOUSLY HAVE THE CAPABILITY AND RELATIONSHIP WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, WE CAN HAVE THAT FIRE SERVICE BUT NOT PUBLISH RF CAPABILITY BECAUSE WE AREN'T REQUIRED TO. THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS YOU CAN GO. ONE OF THE THINGS YOU MIGHT THINK ABOUT IS WHEN WE GET TO THE PART OF THIS THAT IS ON THE BUSINESS AND, THE FA WILL STILL EXPECT THAT WE HAVE SOME SORT OF A LEASE AGREEMENT IN PLACE FOR USE OF THIS PARCEL. ANTICIPATE WE COULD HAVE SOME SORT OF LEASE AGREEMENT THAT HAS A VALUE FOR LEASE OF A PARCEL AND USED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT MINUS THE VALUE OF THE RF COMPONENT IN THE BAY. BUT THEN WE ARE GOING TO GET A FIRE SERVICE. THAT IS GOING TO HAVE AN IMPACT AS WELL.
IF WE RECEIVE A FIRE SERVICE WITHOUT RF CAPABILITY IS A LOWER COST.
BUT IF WE WANT AN RF SERVICE, WE MAY BE EXPECTED TO THEN COMPENSATE FOR THAT CAPABILITY AS WELL. OR OFFSET THE VALUE OF THE LEASE FOR THAT.
I THINK THE SHORT ANSWER TO DAVE'S QUESTION, WE ARE NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE RF CAPABILITY.
I THINK WE DO HAVE TO NAIL IT DOWN, WHAT LEVEL OF THAT SERVICE WE WANT FROM THE FIRE STATION
NEXT TO THE AIRPORT. >> UNDERSTOOD. THANK YOU.
>> WOULD ALSO HAVE AN IMPACT ON INSURANCE? >> AS FAR AS -- FOR WHO?
FOR USERS? >> FOR THE STATE, THE AIRPORT. >> I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO
THAT AIR -- QUESTION. >> IT SEEMS LIKE IT WOULD HELP IT WOULD REDUCE OUR RATES IF WE
SERVICE. >> THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. I'M NOT SURE.
MIGHT HAVE TO POKE AROUND. IF YOU HAVE A SHORTER RESPONSE TIME WITH FIRE SERVICE CLOSER IF
THAT AFFECTS YOUR RATES. I'M NOT SURE. >> MR. CARDONE, WHAT'S THE IMPACT OF THE BLACK LINE WITH DRAWING THE WAY IT IS IN SUCH A WAY TO BE 5.67 ACRES FOR THIS FIREHOUSE? IS THIS MANDATED BY THE CITY OR SOMETHING ELSE THAT WE HAVE THIS
IN SETBACKS? >> KNOW. I NEED TO TAKE A LOOK AT THAT.
THIS WAS DONE BY OUR GUYS IN NEW YORK. I THINK WHAT THEY DID IS THEY JUST TOOK THE LINES OF THE AREA THAT WAS DEFINED BY OURSELVES TO INVESTIGATE THE SIGN AREA.
THE SIDE AREA WOULD REALLY BE REDUCED TO REALLY ENCOMPASS THE EDGE OF THE AIRPORT RODE TO THE FENCE, DOWN THE FENCE AND BACK STRAIGHT UP TO HER WHERE THE FENCE AND THE VOLT IS WORK THAT WOULD REALLY BE THE SITE THAT WE CONSIDERED THE FIREHOUSE. THAT WHOLE TREE AREA AND THAT WHOLE AREA. AND WE DON'T WANT TO STAY IN FRONT OF THE FIREHOUSE BECAUSE
THAT COULD STILL BE USABLE LAND. >> SORT OF WANTED TO MAKE SURE --
>> THAT NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED. THAT IS NOT SHOWN PROPERLY. >> OKAY.
THANK YOU. >> THAT WHOLE AREA IS NOT GOING TO BE CONSIDERED SITE FOR THE
FIREHOUSE. >> JUST DIDN'T WANT TO BE HAVING TOO MANY TREES KNOCKED DOWN.
>> ABSOLUTELY NOT. I THINK WE ARE ONLY TAKING DOWN -- I THINK THERE'S ONLY GOING TO BE A FEW SCRUB TREES THAT WILL BE TAKEN DOWN FOR THE TOWER.
[00:55:05]
VERY FEW. MAYBE SIX, I THINK AT MOST. >> THANK YOU.
>> WHERE IN THE FUNDING PLANNING ACTUALLY HAPPENING PROCESS ARE WE WITH THIS?
>> LET ME JOG MY MEMORY A LIT -- A BIT. THIS WORK IS BEING DONE IN THIS FISCAL YEAR UNDER A WORK ORDER THAT THE CITY IS FUNDING. IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, WE HAVE THE FIRST RUN OF FUNDING FOR AN AFTER THOUGHT COMPONENT SET UP TO SEE A GRANT FROM THEM IN JULY OF 21. THERE FISCAL YEAR '21. THE WAY AFT GRANTS WORK IS SUCH THAT TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR FUNDING REIMBURSEMENT, YOU CAN'T START THE WORK FOR THE SCOPE OF THE SERVICE BEFORE YOU HAVE EXECUTED THAT GRANT AGREEMENT. YOU MAY HAVE MULTIPLE GRANT AGREEMENTS ACROSS FISCAL YEARS TO GIVE YOU MORE MONEY, BUT IT IS THAT FIRST PRIMARY GRANT AGREEMENT THAT OPENS THE FUNDING. THAT IS COMING, IF OUR REMEMBER, -- IN JULY '21. JULY '21 WE EXECUTE THE FINAL PIECE ON IT IS WITH THE CITY COMMISSION CITY COMMISSION TO MOVE FORWARD ON THE PROJECT. I DON'T KNOW THE COMMISSION SUPPORT THE DESIGN. I DON'T KNOW YET -- THEY HAVE NOT HAD A DISCUSSION OVER SUPPORT GOING BEYOND THE DESIGN PHASE YET. I DON'T KNOW THE IMPACT OF THAT
CONVERSATION TIMELINE BUT IT IS CONTINGENT ON THAT AS WELL. >> WHAT IS THE GENERAL TARGET
FOR COMPLETION OF IT? >> I THINK IF YOU DID START THE PROJECT -- SAY IT WAS BID AND STARTED IN LATE SUMMER OR FALL OF 2021, I IMAGINE THIS IS PROBABLY A TEN MONTH BUILD.
WHAT WOULD YOU THINK? >> YEAH. WITHIN A YEAR.
WITHIN THE YEAR. IT WILL BE WITHIN A YEAR. >> AND THAT IS ALL CONTINGENT UPON CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL AND A BIDDING PROCESS AND A NUMBER OF OTHER FACTORS.
>> THE PRIMARY ROLE AS A FIREHOUSE IS A CITY OF FERNANDINA BEACH FIRE
DEPARTMENTS REPLACE -- >> THAT'S CORRECT. THE PURPOSE OF REPLACING THAT FACILITY AND SERVE THE PUBLIC PRIMARILY AND HAVE THE RF BAY WITH A FIRE VEHICLE -- VEHICLE
FOR THE AIRPORT. >> THANKS. >> HAVE ONE OF THE QUESTION.
I THINK WE BROUGHT UP AND POSTPONED IT UNTIL JULY THE OWNERSHIP OF THE SESSILE LANE PARCEL. IS THERE ANYTHING MORE UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION ON THAT?
>> I'M STILL WORKING -- WAITING ON INFORMATION. >> COST DIFFERENCES?
>> ON THE LEFT AGENDA WE HAD A REFERENCE TO AGENDA ITEM FOR PORTIONS OF CESSNA LANE NORTH OF AIRPORT RODE. WE ARE LOOKING AT HISTORY TO DETERMINE IF IT WAS IDENTIFIED AS A RIGHT-OF-WAY. IF YOU ABANDON A RIGHT-OF-WAY THE APPLICATIONS ARE DIFFERENT THAN IF IT IS A ROADWAY. I HAVE TWO THINGS GOING ON. I NEED TO FIND IT WAS ACTUALLY DEDICATED AS A RIGHT-OF-WAY. IS ALSO SHOWN ON OUR AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN AND THERE ARE THINGS TO DO TO DISPOSE OF THAT PROPERTY. IS A BIT OF A RESEARCH PROJECT GOING ON TO MAKE SURE I KNOW EXACTLY WHAT WAS DONE AND IF I NEED TO GO BACK TO THE FAA AND SAY THIS WAS A RIGHT-OF-WAY. WAS IT RELEASED THE RIGHT WAY FROM THE FAA TO MAKE A
RIGHT-OF-WAY. I'M STILL WORKING ON IT. >> OKAY.
THOUGHT IT WOULD BRING IT UP BECAUSE WE HAD MENTIONED IT. >> MY THOUGHT WAS GOING TO BE AN EASIER CONVERSATION. IT WAS LIKE OPENING A CAN OF WORMS.
>> OKAY. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?
>> THIS IS DON. ABOUT THAT WAS GREAT NEWS ON THE SOLAR RATE AND THE PROGRESS AND
HOW IT IS HELPING US SO FAR. IT'S GOOD NEWS. >> IT IS GOOD NEWS.
THAT WORKED OUT PRETTY GOOD. I DIDN'T MENTION IT. FPU CAME OUT THIS WEEK AND INSTALLED THEIR METER. AT MAX LOAD FOR THE BUILDING WHEN WE ARE GETTING GOOD SUNSHINE, PRODUCING MORE LOAD THAN THE BUILDING CAN HOLD SO WE ARE SELLING POWER BACK TO FD YOU AS WELL. IS NOT A LOT OF MONEY, TO PUT A LINE ITEM IN THE BUDGET.
THAT METER IS IN AND WE ARE PRODUCING MORE POWER THAN THE BUILDING IS USING.
WE ARE RIGHT NOW SELLING POWER BACK TO FPU. THAT'S ONE OF THE BENEFITS OF
THE PROCESS. NOTHING ELSE? >> OUR NEXT MEETING I THINK
[Items 10 & 11]
[01:00:10]
WOULD BE IN AUGUST. SAME PROCESS. I THINK YOU ALL SAW MY E-MAIL ABOUT THE STATE EXTENDING THE VIRTUAL MEETING ALLOWANCE. WHAT I WILL DO IS THE SAME THING. I'LL KEEP YOU INFORMED AS WE MOVE THROUGH.NOT MAKING ANY ASSUMPTIONS. I CAN WORK WITH DAVE AND WE CAN SCHEDULE A MEETING BASED ON WHATEVER THAT THE GUIDANCE IS AND WORK THAT OUT. ALL OF THAT PENDING OUR NEXT
MEETING WILL BE I BELIEVE. >> 13TH? >> 13TH OF AUGUST.
>> OKAY. >> VERY GOOD. >> ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING ELSE?
>> IS BRIAN RAISING HIS HAND? >> IS HE MUTED? >> HAVE A GOOD NIGHT.
THANKS EVERYONE. THE MEETING IS ADJOURNED AT 7:06.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.