>> WELCOME BACK, WE MISSED YOU LAST WEEK.
[00:00:10]
>> BECAUSE ORDER THE OCTOBER 18-20 TO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY EXECUTIVE MEETING.
ADAM CLARK, PLEASE CALL THE ROLE.
>> HOUSEKEEPING, PERSONAL DEVICES SILENT OR ON AIRPLANE.
WE ARE ALL AWARE OF COVID SO PROTECT YOUR HEALTH AND GENTLEMEN, WE WILL BEHAVE OURSELVES.
ITEM 4, PRESENTATION. NO? WE HAVE A PRESENTATION? ITEM 5, DISCUSSION, DIRECTION
[5.1 Waterfront Rezoning]
AND ACTION ITEMS. 5.1 IS WATERFRONT REZONING AND I BELIEVE COMMISSIONER ROSS, YOU PUT THIS ON THE AGENDA:>> IT WAS ORIGINALLY THE ARGUMENT WILL BE TICKETED THE CRA ADVISORY BOARD FOR THIS WAS A DISCUSSION INITIATED BY COMMISSIONER ROSSFORD IF I BRING IT UP OR STANDING WRONGLY CORRECTLY. ONE OF THE CONCERNS THAT IS AN OFFER BY SOME OF YOU IS THE CONCERN OF ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE WATERFRONT, SPECIFICALLY THE AREAS OF WHAT IS COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS PARKING LOT C AND D. SOUTH OF THE BOAT RAMP. ONE WAY PERHAPS REASSURING THE COMMUNITY OR SAFEGUARDING AGAINST ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IS TO CONSIDER REZONING THAT AREA THAT IS CURRENTLY ZONED WATERFRONT INDUSTRIAL, ZONING A LARGE PORTION OF THE AREA AS RECREATION.
WHAT YOU HAVE I GAVE YOU AS A HANDOUT IS APPEARED I HAVE THREE CITY LOTS DOWN HERE. THERE IS THE ONE PARCEL BORDERED BY LOT 29 AND 30 ANOTHER PARCEL THAT ENCOMPASSES THIS LOT IS 31, 30 TO AND 33 AND A SMALL MATCH AT THE TOP IS THE CURRENT LEASEHOLDER FOR ATLANTIC SEAFOOD.
IT WOULD BE THE ENTIRETY TO ENCOMPASS PARKING LOT D AND THE ENTIRETY OF OUR 31, 30 TO, 33 AND ON PORTION OF LOT 34.
>> IT WOULD EXCLUDE 29? >> THE SOUTH PORTION IS ENTIRELY THAT. THE NORTH LOT, WHAT WE ARE MOVING FOR AND IN DISCUSSIONS WITH THE NEW LEASEHOLDER OF ATLANTIC CITY IS RECONSTITUTING LOT 29, ROUGHLY 9000 SQUARE-FOOT LOT WHICH YOU CAN SEE, A LOT OF IT IS WATER.
REGARDING THE CURRENT ATLANTIC SEAFOOD LEASE INTO THE ENTIRETY OF LOT 29. LOT 29 WOULD NOT BE RECREATIONAL. WE WILL LEAVE THAT AS THE INDUSTRIAL WATERFRONT FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT THE REST OF THAT FIRST PARCEL, THE NORTHERN PARCEL, 30 AND PARCEL 31, THAT WOULD BE RECREATION. WE WOULD GET A SURVEY AND MOVE FORWARD WITH THAT. WHAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR TONIGHT IS A RECOMMENDATION TO HAVE THIS GO TO THE PAB FOR THEIR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION.FOR YOUR INFORMATION, THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDED AGAINST THIS ON A THREE ÃTOVOTE BOY . THE THREE WERE AND MAYOR - - AND COMMISSIONER ROSS LEFT THE MEETING, THEY WANTED TO RETAIN THE ABILITY TO HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AT THE SOUTH AND, THE CURRENT LOCATION.
WHAT I'M LOOKING FOR YOU IS A RECOMMENDATION SIMILAR TO THE IN LINE OF THE CRA ADVISORY BOARD TO TAKE THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD FOR REZONING A PORTION OF THE BOX THAT ARE
CURRENTLY IDENTIFIED HERE. >> VICE MAYOR, YOU HAVE THE
FLOOR. >> IS AT THE WETLANDS ON THERE?
>> CORRECT. >> 35 IS PRIVATELY OWNED.
>> IT'S A GREAT IDEA, I WOULD SUPPORT THAT.
I WOULD QUESTION LOT 29, IF WE LEAVE THAT OUT.
[00:05:01]
THE LEASE IS A SMALL PORTION OF 29.>> I THINK WHAT WILL HAPPEN IS THE WHOLE PROCESS OF GOING TO THE PAB AND COMING BACK TO YOU WITH THE READINGS, WE WILL LEARN MORE BY THE END OF THIS MONTH OF WHAT IS MR. FALLS MARSHALL WHAT HE THOUGHT ABOUT BEFORE IS NOT A 9000 SQUARE-FOOTBUILDING , JUST A PORTION OF THE EXPERT WHEN YOU START LOOKING AT HOW DO YOU ORIENT, IT'S ORIENTED NORTH-SOUTH INSTEAD OF GOING EAST WEST.
ONCE WE LEARN MORE, WE WILL MORE DEFINITIVELY OUTLINE THE BORDER OF WHAT IS GOING TO REMAIN AS WATERFRONT INDUSTRIA
. >> I STRONGLY ENDORSE MOVING
FORWARD. >> OKAY, I HAVE ONE YES.
GENTLEMEN, WHAT IS YOUR PLEASURE?
COMMISSIONER STURGIS? >> THANK YOU MAYOR.
I THINK IS A GOOD IDEA AS LONG AS WE LEAVE 29ALONE .
I THINK THOSE ARE A FEW LOTS THAT WE CAN REZONE.
AS FAR AS I KNOW, WE DON'T HAVE ANY PRESENCE OF WANTING COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY DOWN THERE. IF ANYTHING, JUST MORE GREEN GRASS AND PARKING, WHAT WE ALREADY HAVE.
>> A COUPLE THINGS FOR COMMISSIONER ROSS THOMPSON, PARKING IS PERMITTED USE UNDER RECREATION.
ONE OTHER CHANGE THAT WE HAVE TO MAKE TO LAND DEVELOPMENT IS TO ALLOW MARINA AS A PERMISSIBLE USE AND RECREATION.
RIGHT NOW, IT IS NOT ALLOWED FOR THAT.
>> YOU TOOK THE WORDS OUT OF MY MOUTH.
I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IF WE HAD TO ACCESS OR, WE PUT EXTRA PEER OUT FOR MARINA USE FOR SOME REASON FOR OUR MARINA,
THAT I WOULD WANT THAT. >> THAT IS FOR THE EXISTING CITY MARINA RIGHT NOW IT IS ACCESSED THROUGH THESE PARCELS,
YOU WOULD HAVE TO BE A CHANGE. >> THAT IS ALL MY CONCERN IS, THAT'S IT. BUT I DO SUPPORT THIS.
>> COMMISSIONER DEAN? COMMISSIONER ROSS?
THOUGHTS? >> THANK YOU MR. MAYOR.
I AM ABSOLUTELY FINE WITH THE CURRENT USE STAYING THE SAME.
I LIKE HAVING THE OPEN SPACE IN THE PARKING, BUT I WANT TO ECHO WHAT COMMISSIONER STURGIS SAID. THE REASON I'M HESITANT TO MAKE THOSE CHANGES BECAUSE WE CURRENTLY HAVE A ZONING INDUSTRIAL WATERFRONT THAT ALLOWS THESE DOCS AND WHATNOT FROM THE MARINA. I LIKE IT THE WAY IT IS RIGHT NOW, CHANGE RECREATION WOULD ALLOW CHANGING - -. HE WOULD HAVE TO DO ALL THAT ONCE AT THE SAME TIME.
THANK YOU. >> COMMISSIONER ROSS?
>> I HAD THOUGHT ABOUT IT AND I OBVIOUSLY SUPPORT THIS.
THIS HAS BEEN THE IDEA FOR 25 YEARS OF KEEPING THIS AN OPEN SPACE. I THINK IT IS A DECLARATION OF
OUR INTENTIONS. >> THANK YOU SIR, ANYONE ELSE? OKAY, I WILL FOLLOW-UP WITH THIS BUSINESS FULLY AND GET WITH THE PUBLIC ONCE WE HAVE A DESIGN WHICH AS MULTI-BUILDING ON IT. IT AS AN AMPHITHEATER AND IS A RETAIL BUILDING. WE HAD ALL OF THESE AND WE PRESENTED ITTO ALL OF THE COMMITTEES .
I THINK I ATTENDED 90% OF THOSE AND OVERWHELMINGLY REJECT THEM.
PEOPLE WANT THAT TO BE UNNATURAL RIVERFRONT AND REMAIN AS IS. JUST A REMINDER OF THAT.
I SUPPORT IT AS WELL. I'M NOT QUITE SURE COMMISSIONER, DO YOU SUPPORT IT?
ARE YOU IN THE MIDDLE? >> I SUPPORTED GIVEN THAT WE CAN GRANDFATHERING THE ABILITY, THEY CURRENTLY HAVE MARINA DOCKS. AS IT STANDS AS COMMISSIONER ROSS ADDRESS, IF WE CHANGE IT NOW WITHOUT ADDRESSING THE PLAN DEVELOPING CODE, IT WOULD BE OUT OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE COBRA HAVING THE MARINA ATTACHED TO IT.
YOU WANT TO MAKE SURE ALL THAT GOES.AS MUCH AS I LIKE THE OPEN SPACE, I LIKE HAVING OUR CITY MARINA.
>> I WILL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE FORWARD THE CONCEPT OF LOOKING
AT CHANGING LOTS 30. >> I WOULD NOT NECESSARILY GET THAT DEFINITIVE YET. WE RECOMMEND SUPPORTING THE
CONCEPT. >> WE SUPPORT RECOMMENDING THE CONCEPT INCLUDING CHANGING THE MARINA USE AND RECREATIONAL ZONE PROPERTY. THAT SHOULD BE DONE WHETHER WE
DO THIS ARE NOT. >> WE HAVE A SECOND?
>> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A MOTION AND A
[00:10:01]
SECOND? MADAME CLERK, CAN YOU PLEASECALL THE ROLE ON THAT PLEASE. >>.
[5.2 Letter of Interest- 101 N. Front Street]
ON TO THE PA MEETING. 5-POINT TO THE LETTER OFINTEREST 101 N. FRONT STREET. >> THANK YOU MR. MAYOR.
YOU ARE WELL AWARE AND IT WAS DISCUSSED PUBLICLY AFTER CRA ADVISORY BOARD MEETING, THE CITY DID RECEIVE A LETTER OF INTEREST IN THE CITY ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 101 N.
FRONT STREET. THAT LETTER OF INTEREST CAME FROM THE MONUMENT MARINE GROUP. THEY OFFERED A REFUNDABLE $10,000 DEPOSIT FOR A LIMITED 120 DAY DUE DILIGENCE PERIOD.
I WILL RECHECK ALL OF YOU AND RECEIVED TO VERBAL AFFIRMATION OF SUPPORT AND TO WRITTEN AFFIRMATION OF SUPPORT.
I DIDN'T RESPOND - - $1000 DEPOSIT WAS RECEIVED OCTOBER 12. I DID ASK THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MONUMENT GROUP, I INVITED THEM TO OFFER ANY COMMENTS NOW THAT WE HAVE STARTED THIS RELATIONSHIP.
HE JUST EMAILED IF YOU WERE NOT MIND ME READING THIS TO YOU.
"THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION OF PASSING ALONG THE GOOD NEWS THE CITY'S ACCEPTANCE OF OUR LETTER OF INTEREST.WE ARE EXCITED ABOUT THE PROSPECT OF BECOMING A WATERFRONT STAKEHOLDER. WE BELIEVE THE CITY'S VISION OF ACTIVATING A WATERFRONT WILL BENEFIT THE LARGER COMMUNITY AND WILL WANT TO BE A PART OF THESE EFFORTS.
THE SITE IS TRULY UNIQUE IN THAT IT STANDS TO BENEFIT THE MEANINGFUL PUBLIC INVESTMENT TO IMPROVE ACCESS AND DESIRABILITY WHILE ALREADY OFFERING A TRUE WHAT PUBLICATION PROXIMITY TO DOWNTOWN JOBS AND ADJACENT TO SUCCESSFUL PROVEN MARINA OPERATION. WE PLAN TO USE OUR VILLAGE PERIOD TO WORK WITH THE CITY AND OUR CONSULTANTS INCLUDING AND NOT LIMITED TO - - LEGAL COUNCIL.
TO DEVELOP A PLAN THEY CURRENTLY IS SET TO INVOLVE THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE WHILE UTILIZING RIGHTS THAT COME WITH THE SITE TO EXPAND THE WET SLIP OFFERING AT FERNANDINA BEACH FOR AT THAT WE WOULD APPRECIATE INTRODUCTION TO ANY OF THE CITY EMPLOYEES OR CONSULTANTS WORKING ON THE WEATHER RIVER WALKWAY TO ENSURE OUR PLANS AND THE TIMING THEREOF IS INTEGRATED WITH THE CITY'S AND TO ENSURE THAT WE ARE ALSO THINKING THROUGH INTEGRATION OF THE 101 N. FRONT STREET FRONT STREET IMPROVEMENT.
THANK YOU AGAIN FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, YOU WILL BE IN TOUCH AS OUR DUE DILIGENCE PROCESS COULD REST.".
>> VICE MAYOR? >> I DID WATCH THE CRA MEETING.
WOULD YOU REITERATE THAT WE WENT OUT TO DISTANT CITY SEEKING INTEREST AND THERE WAS ONLY RESPONDER:
>> WE DO NOT. I WAS IN DISCUSSIONS WITH THE SCREW. THEY PROVIDED AN INITIAL LETTER OF INTEREST. BEFORE ACTUALLY SECURING, I ASKED THEM. THEY SHOULD APPROVE IN YOUR LETTER OF INTEREST, THAT WAS ON THE BOOKS BEFORE WE SOLICITED SO IN CASE WE DID NEED ABROKER , I SAID I HAVE TO GO OUT UNLESS YOU OBLIGATE A SPECIFIC LETTER OF INTEREST WITH A DEPOSIT FOR THIS. THEY RESPONDED IMMEDIATELY BY
OFFERING . >> THISWOULD BE $85,000 A YEAR? IS THAT THE NUMBER YOU'RE
THE CITY DID PREVIOUSLY SECURE APPRAISAL OF THE PROPERTY.
I SHARED THAT PROPERTY APPRAISAL WITH THAT COMPANY AND THEY TENTATIVELY SAID THAT THE LEASE PRICE IS $85,000 PER YEAR AT TRIPLE NET. THEY WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BUILDING THE BUILDING AND OPERATING THE BUILDING AND AT THE END OF THE LEASE PERIOD, WHICH THEY ORIGINALLY PROPOSED A FOUR YEAR EXTENSION - - 40 YEARS AND A SERIES OF SEQUENTIAL TENURE EXTENSIONS. AT THE END OF THE APPROPRIATE LEASE PERIOD, THE BUILDING BECOMES THE PROPERTY OF THE
CITY. >> SHOULD THEY COME BACK AND SAY - - 40 YEARS PLUS? ARE WE CLEAR IN TERMS OF - -
[00:15:08]
>> PART OF THIS DUE DILIGENCE PERIOD COULD GO BACK, DURING THIS DUE DILIGENCE PERIOD YOU WILL CONDUCT LEASE NEGOTIATIONS
AS A PART OF THIS AS WELL. >> THANK YOU MR. MAYOR.
WHAT ABOUT INFLATION? IS THAT THEY CAN TO THIS COST SOMEHOW? IT STARTED OUT AS A GREAT DEAL DECADES AGO BUT OVER TIME, IT HASN'T GROWN THE SAME WAY.
IS THE 85,000 THROUGHOUT ORDERS TO GROW OVER TIME?
>> IN ALL LIKELIHOOD, WE WILL INCORPORATE A COST-OF-LIVING INCREASE AND THAT WOULD BE A PART OF THE LEASE NEGOTIATIONS.
>> POINTS OF REFERENCE ON THE WATERFRONT, TIMMY BOX CITY ATTORNEY, THANK YOU. SO THE LEASE, THAT WAS A CALCULATION MISTAKE MADE IN THE MID 90S, THAT WAS TO LEAVE THE LEASE WE DON'T CONNECT ANYWHERE NEAR MARKET RATE RENTS.
TO MY KNOWLEDGE IN THE ENTIRE CITY, THAT IS THE ONLY LEASE WHERE WE ARE NOT COLLECTING TODAY'S MARKET RATES.
A GOOD EXAMPLE IS ATLANTIC SEAFOOD.
THEY ARE PAYING 1600 SOMETHING DOLLARS.
BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE AND THE TO APPRAISALS WITH MARKET RATE COMMERCIAL RENT BY SQUARE FOOTAGE, ATLANTIC SEAFOOD IS
PAYING MORE THAN MARKET RATE. >> UNDERSTOOD.
>> IS NOT THAT WE HAVE A SERIES OR LEASES THAT ARE HANGING OUT THERE AND WE ARE NOT GETTING MARKET RENT, THAT IS NOT TRUE.
I JUST LOST MY TRAIN OF THOUGHT, I AM SORRY.
IN THE LEASE AGREEMENT, WE DO BUILD IN FOR INFLATION AND USE THE CPI INDEX AND THE SOUTHERN LABOR INDEX.
>> FOLLOW-UP QUESTION, SO IN YOUR OPINION THIS NEW LEASE
WOULD CORRECT IT? >> THIS IS A LEASE FOR THE - - PROPERTY. SO THAT IS IN THE FUTURE, WE WILL DEAL WITH THAT SITEBUT YES , I KNEW LEASE FOR REDEVELOPMENT THERE, WE WOULD MAKE SURE THAT WE GET MARKET.
FOR THIS, THE CITY HAS NEVER RELEASED IT.
THE CITY PURCHASED IT SEVEN YEARS AGO AND WE HAVE NOT - - OTHER THAN FOR PARKING RIGHT NOW.
>> THANK YOU MAYOR.TAMMY, I THINK IT'S MORE OF A CLARIFICATION. BRADLEY ADDRESSED THE INFLATION PART ESCALATING, ONE OF MY STIPULATIONS, THIS IS NOTHING PERSONAL, I DON'T WANT OUTSIDE COUNCIL, SOMEONE WHO WRITES THESE, THAT IS WHAT I WANT TO WRITE BUTAT LEAST IN MY OPINION . SOMEONE THAT WRITES THESE IN COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE EVERY DAY.
THEY LOOK AT TRIPLE NET LEASES. I WANT YOU TO GO, IN MY OPINION, I DON'T KNOW THE REST OF THE COMMISSION WOULD BE INTERESTED IN THIS. I JUST THINK IT WAS A BARRIER INBETWEEN YOU, AND PERSONALLY MYSELF .NOT AS A COMMISSION, BUT YOU AS A JOB POSITION. IT WOULD PUT A BARRIER SAYING HEY CAN WE HAVE AN OUTSIDE SOURCE THAT WE RECOMMENDED THAT DOES THIS ALL THE TIME. THEY ARE RIGHT FOR THIS LEASE FOR WHAT NORMAL MARKET RATES. WE HAVE ALL THE FACTORS BUT THEY WOULD HELP IN COPYING THIS LEASE.
>> ON THAT WITH MY ANNUAL LIST OF LAW FIRMS THAT I USE FOR OUTSIDE COUNSEL, I CANNOT THINK OF ANYONE OF THEM THAT HAS, I CAN CHECK, THAT THATHAS THE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE LAWYER THAT IS ALL THEY DO . I CAN BRING A RECOMMENDATION TO
YOU. >> I WOULD APPRECIATE THAT, THAT'S MY THOUGHT PROCESSES. I DON'T KNOW IF ANYONE ELSE ON THE COMMISSION FEELS THAT WAY, BUT WE WILL LOOK BACK IN 20 TO 30 YEARS AND THINK TAMMI BACH IS TERRIBLE, SHE WAS THE ONE THAT PUT THE LEASE, WHERE IS ALL THIS MONEY AT? IF WE HAD A COMPANY THAT DOES IT ALL THE TIME.
>> I DON'T HESITATE TO DO THAT ON MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS WE HAVE THE GOLF COURSE AND MARINA, WE HIRED PEOPLE TO DO THIS FOR US. DO YOU HAVE A PREFERENCE WHETHER OR NOT TO USE ANY LOCAL ATTORNEYS?
[00:20:03]
>> I DO, I LIKE LOCAL ATTORNEYS.
>> THAT WAS ALL I NEEDED TO KNOW.
>> THAT WAS ONE OPINION. [LAUGHTER].
NICE TRY. >> YOU WANT SOMEONE TO SPECIALIZE IN COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE.
>> CORRECT. >> WHAT HERE FOR YOU IS THAT
YOU WANT A LOCALATTORNEY ? >> CORRECT.
>> I COULD TELL YOU THAT THERE ARE NO LOCAL ATTORNEY TO
SPECIALIZE IN REAL ESTATE. >> THAT'S NOT TRUE, - -
SPECIALIZES. >> OKAY, THERE YOU GO.
>> IS THAT AGREEABLE? SHOULD I ASKED JOHN TO GIVE US A PROPOSAL? HE IS NOT TO TAKE IT
PERSONALLY. >> I UNDERSTAND, BUT I THINK WE ARE GETTING THE CART BEFORE THE HORSE.
THEY HAVE NOT NEGOTIATED ANYTHING OR SAY WHAT THEY WANT TO DO. YOU MAY HATE OR CONCEPT.
WE ARE IN THE WEEDS RIGHT HERE, GENTLEMEN.
>> IT IS GOOD DIRECTION FOR ME EVEN THOUGH THIS IS A REGULAR CRA MEETING, IT'S GOOD! YOU HAVE DIRECTIONS OF THEIR SCALAWAG IT IS TO BESIDES THEY HAVE TO TAKE THE 120 DAYS, THEY
MADE MENTION 30 OR 60 DAYS AND YET BE READY TO GO.>> I HAVE
NO OPPOSITION TO EITHER WAY. >> OKAY.
>> I THINK WE SHOULD PROCEED AND SEE WHAT I CAN DO.
I AGREE WITH DAVE, IF WE CAN GET SOMEBODY WAS QUALIFIED AND
LOCAL, THAT IS DESIRABLE. >> QUALIFIED AND LOCAL WOULD BE
DESIRABLE. >> WONDERFUL, THANK YOU.
>> ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS?NO?
ALRIGHT, MOVING ON. >> MR. MAYOR, IF I COULD CONFIRM THAT ALTHOUGH YOU AUTHORIZED ME AS CITY COMMISSIONERS, DO YOU WANT TO VALIDATE A DECISION THAT I
RESPONDED AFFIRMATIVELY. >> AND MAKE A MOTION AND WE SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT INITIATIVE OF EMBRACING THIS
>> DISCUSSION? THAT HORSE IS ALREADY OUT OF THE BARN, THAT'S HOW I LOOK AT IT.
WE CAN TAKE A BOAT. >> SOUNDS GOOD.
>> MADAME CLERK, WOULD YOU CALL THE BALL ON THAT MOTION PLEASE? ZERO.ANYTHING ELSE ON THE LETTER?
>> NOW AFTER THE HORSE HAS LEFT, THE CRA DID RECOMMEND
[5.3 CRA Matrix]
AGAINST THIS LETTER OF INTERES .>> RMI, ITEM 5.3, THE CRA MATRIX WHICH I BELIEVE EVERYONE
HAS A COPY OF. >> I HAVE A COPY FOR GENERAL PUBLIC AND HAVE GIVEN A COPY TO MS. ROBERTS.
THIS IS AN EFFORT LED BY MR. PLATT TO PROVIDE A PARCEL BY PARCEL SUMMARY OF ALL ACTIVITY WITHIN THE CRA.
>> I HAVE ONE, IT IS COMMITTED TO MEMORY.
>> I CAN EXPLAIN THE COLUMNS ACROSS THE TOP, BUT AGAIN, THIS IS INTENDED TO BE A MONTHLY REPORT TO THE CRA ADVISORY BOARD. PARCEL BY PARCEL ALL PROPERTIES IN THE CRA IDENTIFY BY PARCEL ID, ZONING, FUTURE LAND USE, SOMETIMES THE CAUSE BUT A MORE COMMON NAME, WHAT IS CURRENT PROPERTY USES, IS ADDRESS NUMBER IN THE FOLLOWING COLUMNS MEANS THERE HAS BEEN NO ENGAGEMENT WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER, NO ACTIVITY, NO KNOWN ACTIVITY, IT IS LIKE CITY HALL.
IT'S HERE AND IS OPERATING. WE HAVE ENGAGED IN SUPPLEMENTARYDISCUSSIONS . TRC MEANS THE HEAVILY SUBLIMINAL AREA. PERMIT MEANS THEY HAVE SECURE THE BUILDING PERMITS. COM CLEANING THEIR PROJECT IS
[00:25:03]
COMPLETE. YOU WILL SEE ON THE BACK PAGE, ADDITIONALLY THAT THERE ARE PUBLIC PROJECTS THE CITY IS CURRENTLY UNDERTAKING THAT ARE OVERARCHING CITY PROPERTIES OR - - DRAINAGE PROJECTS, ATLANTIC SEAFOOD.WHAT WILL CHANGE EACH MONTH IS THAT WE WILL HIGHLIGHT ANY CHANGES TO THE PREVIOUS MONTH. SO NEXT MONTH'S REPORT, ALTHOUGH YOU WILL SEE IN YELLOW WILL GO BACK TO WHITE AND YOU WILL THAT HIGHLIGHT IF YOU HAVING YOU DISCUSSIONS.MAYBE WE WILL HAVE MORE WITH ATLANTIC SEAFOOD.
AT A GLANCE, YOU WILL BE ABLE TO SEE WHAT ACTIVITIES GOING ON
TO THE CRA. >> ON ATLANTIC SEAFOOD, WE EXPECT NET DESIGN BY NOVEMBER 1, CORRECT?
>> YES. >> WE CAN UPDATE THAT.
>> IS EFFECTIVE AS OF SEPTEMBER 1.
>> COMMISSIONER ROSS? >> I THINK THIS IS VERY USEFUL AND I APPRECIATE YOU PROVIDING THIS.PERHAPS YOU CAN PUT THIS
UP ON THE CRA. >> WE CAN ADD THAT TO THE
>> THIS IS AN EXCELLENT REPORT. AS THE CRA ADVISORY COMMITTEE GOES OUT AND DO USE WHATEVER THEY ARE DOING, THEY WILL
COORDINATE WITH JACOB? >> THIS IS NOT INTENDED AS SOME STAFF ACTIVITY OR CITY GOVERNMENT ACTIVITY.
>> COMMISSIONER STURGIS? >> THANK YOU MAYOR.
I HAVE ONE QUESTION DALE, TO HIGHLIGHT - - ON THE BACK PAGE ON THING THAT IS HIGHLIGHTED ARETHESE TWO PROPERTIES .
IT'S TO 20 NORTH SECOND STREET. WHAT IS THE, AT THE VERY END?
>> PROJECT IS COMPLETED. >> THAT WAS A CHANGE, WE ORIGINALLY PREPARED THIS FOR SEPTEMBER CRA ADVISORY BOARD MEETING AND THAT NEVER HAPPENED.
IN ORDER TO START THE PROCESS OF UPDATING WITH HIGHLIGHT EACH MONTH, THAT WAS A CHANGE FOR THE SEPTEMBER REPORT WHICH NOBODY REALLY SAW THE OCTOBER REPORT.
WE HAVE CONSTRUCTION IN THE SEPTEMBER REPORT.
>> THESE ARE HOTEL HOMES THAT HAVE BEEN BUILT?
>> CORRECT. >> THAT IS NOT CORRECT.
THOSE ARE RENTAL APARTMENTS. >> ANYONE OF SOME NATURE.
RMI, THAT IS IT, THE ONLY QUESTION THAT I HAVE.
OTHER THAN IS SAYS IS PROJECTED TO HAPPEN IN BETWEEN THERE AND EACH ONE OF THESE AREAS, THAT IS ALL I HAVE, THANK YOU.
>> THIS WILL BE ADDED TO THE CRA ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA.
IF YOU HAVE ACCESS TO THE CRA ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA, YOU WILL
[5.4 Vacancies]
HAVE ACCESS TO THIS. >> EXCELLENT WORK, THANK YOU.
ITEM 5.4 I BELIEVE IS THE CRA VACANCIES.
>> THANK YOU MR. CHAIRMAN. THERE ARE CURRENTLY THREE VACANCIES. WE THE TO PREVIOUS VACANCIES, MR. ALLEN - - RESIGNED FOLLOWED BY MISS DEAN SMITH AND FOLLOWING THE LAST MR. - - RESIGNED DUE TO COMMITMENTS AND OBLIGATIONS. WE HAVE THREE VACANCIES, WE CURRENTLY HAVE TO APPLICATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AND THEY ARE TIED TO VARY SPECIFIC PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUNDS.
MR. - - IS APPLY FOR ONE WITHIN A MILE OF THE CRA AND MR. ERIC BARTEL COMMITTED AN APPLICATION IS A MARKETING BRANDING PROFESSIONAL. THOSE ARE TO APPLICATIONS FOR
THE THREE CURRENT VACANT SEATS. >> ANY DISCUSSION ON THAT?
VICE MAYOR? >> IT'S A DIVISIVE ISSUE TO THE
[00:30:02]
VALUE THAT THE ADVISORY BOARD. I JUST SAW A LOT OF HOSTILITY AND PUSHBACK. I DID NOT SEE THE VALUE OF THAT BOARD. HOPEFULLY WITH THE NEW MEMBERS COMING IN, IT CAN BE TURNED AROUND.IT'S ALMOST LIKE IT'S ADVERSARIAL AND THAT IS CRAZY, WE DON'T NEED THAT.HOPEFULLY THESE NEWS GUYS COMING FRANK AND CAN CHANGE IT INTO A POSITIVE GOING FORWARD INSTEAD
OF JUST BEING STUPID. >> COMMISSIONER ROSS?
>> WITH THE CHAIRMAN DEPARTING, THERE WILL BE A DIFFERENT
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS? >> I BELIEVE WE HAVE THREE APPLICANTS NOW, THAT IS VERY EXCITING.
WE ARE THREE FOR THREE AS OF RIGHT NOW.
>> THAT I MISSED ONE? I AM SORRY.
I MISSED THE THIRD APPLICANT? >> YES, SIR, WE DID RECEIVE ONE THIRD APPLICANT TODAY BUT I'M NOT SURE WHICH CES FILLED, I
HAVE NOT HEARD BACK. >> THOSE COURT APPOINTMENTS ARE ON THE NOVEMBER 1 COMMISSION AGENDA.
>> GREAT. IS THERE ANY OTHER BUSINESS FOR THE CRA EXECUTIVE BOARD TO ADDRESS ? SEEING ON
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.